IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] L2VPN overlap?

Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com> Tue, 04 October 2011 04:40 UTC

Return-Path: <muraris@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CE921F8F25 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3UHp5pdbh987 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.214]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9408121F8F23 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.178) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:43:08 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC300.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.30]) by TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.178]) with mapi id 14.01.0339.002; Mon, 3 Oct 2011 21:43:08 -0700
From: Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nvo3] L2VPN overlap?
Thread-Index: AQHMgjoEiy9OUh8bF0OpS2Y/q8sROpVrm8VW
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:43:08 +0000
Message-ID: <EF5EF2B13ED09B4F871D9A0DBCA463C216CD8BC2@TK5EX14MBXC300.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <201110040004.p94048u7009531@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <201110040004.p94048u7009531@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_EF5EF2B13ED09B4F871D9A0DBCA463C216CD8BC2TK5EX14MBXC300r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [nvo3] L2VPN overlap?
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "L2 \"Network Virtualization Over l3\" overlay discussion list \(nvo3\)" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 04:40:05 -0000

Why are we restricting the discussion to just L2 overlays? The virtual topology can be L3 as well.

Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Thomas Narten
Sent: 10/3/2011 7:04 PM
To: nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: [nvo3] L2VPN overlap?

FYI, a discussion of sorts started on the L2VPN list as to whether L2
overlays as proposed for this list are already in-scope for the L2VPN
WG.

I.e., see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/current/msg02874.html

Thomas
_______________________________________________
nvo3 mailing list
nvo3@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email