Re: [nwcrg] nwcrg @ ietf106 minutes

> All the comments from Lloyd Wood and Vincent Roca have been answered
> (see details in github I-D repository for Lloyd’s comments).

Well, this is news to me. If something is brought up on the list,
I'd expect it to be answered on the list, as the primary place
where work is discussed. Where is this? Thanks.

> Some satellite vocabulary (satellite "payload" and "FECFRAME"
> in the satellite context) may create confusion at IETF and these
> terms have been removed.
I can see satellite payload/packet vs frame payload causingconfusion if no context is provided, and there is little needto refer to the satellite platform/payload distinction when everythingis going through the communications payload. However, there is aglossary in the draft where the term and its use can be explicitlycalled out. A glossary is to clear up confusion about vocabulary;that is why it is there.

FECFRAME is integral to DVB-S and S2, which the draft relieson heavily. That an IETF group chose the same name, what, adecade later is merely a coincidence. And there is a glossaryin the draft where the term and its use(s) can be explicitly calledout.

Really, discussing DVB-S without not even saying why you'renot addressing the key FECFRAME component of DVB-S isinsufficient, or not clarifying error correction vs erasurecorrection in some detail particularly where terminology (FEC)overlaps, is not enough in my view.

noted on the draft:

   Physical and link layers coding protection is
   usually sufficient to guarranty Quasi-Error Free, with a negligeableshould be
Physical- and link-layer coding protection are usuallysufficient to guarantee Quasi-Error-Free communications,with a negligible...

Please run a spellcheck before asking for anotherlast call.

thanks and regards

Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk http://about.me/lloydwood 

    On Tuesday, 26 November 2019, 01:08:12 GMT+11, Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr> wrote:  

 Dear all,

We have uploaded the preliminary meeting minutes in the datatracker:
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-106-nwcrg/
Please tell us if you have comments.

NB: you will also find them in the github repository in IMHO a more readable format
    along with all the slides presented:
    https://github.com/irtf-nwcrg/rg-materials/tree/master/ietf106-2019-11_singapore

We’d like to warmly thank Nicolas, Cédric and Oumaima for taking notes.

Cheers,

 Marie-Jose and Vincent

_______________________________________________
nwcrg mailing list
nwcrg@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg