Re: [oam] One example of an updated approach
Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 25 August 2010 04:56 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: oam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4963A6A99 for <oam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.411, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yia+gEi0gkBX for <oam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158713A6A8A for <oam@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAHo/dEyrRN+J/2dsb2JhbACgOXGhOZwNhTcEhDWFQg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,266,1280707200"; d="scan'208";a="176427732"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Aug 2010 04:57:14 +0000
Received: from Freds-Computer.local (sjc-vpn4-964.cisco.com [10.21.83.195]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7P4v550012152; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:57:07 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by Freds-Computer.local (PGP Universal service); Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:57:14 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by Freds-Computer.local on Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:57:14 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B00B3CA1EC@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:56:59 -0700
Message-Id: <19931B5A-3C8A-429D-9718-F338B58BC3A4@cisco.com>
References: <4C6F747A.6070807@cisco.com> <378E2DDD-89EB-4274-B2E6-AB46318E973C@cisco.com> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B00B281B31@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <8C8850A6-0586-4C2D-951F-BFBA5EB6EBFA@cisco.com> <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456B00B3CA1EC@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
To: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "oam@ietf.org" <oam@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [oam] One example of an updated approach
X-BeenThere: oam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <oam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam>, <mailto:oam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oam>
List-Post: <mailto:oam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oam>, <mailto:oam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 04:56:42 -0000
On Aug 24, 2010, at 1:14 PM, Ronald Bonica wrote: >> From my perspective, either we continue with the "you can't talk with >> the network, only over it" paradigm, or we look at a paradigm in which >> the network can itself respond to questions. I think the latter is >> required if we want to do anything that is recursive. >> > > This question is absolutely key, and I would be very interested in co-authoring a paper with you that poses this question to the design session. If you like, I will produce a first draft and send it to you. Sure. Fair warning - I will be out and about, with vacation and travel next week, a WIDE workshop after Labor Day, and an SGIP workshop the week of the 13th. But you know me. I'll find it and fit it in.
- [oam] One example of an updated approach Fred Baker
- Re: [oam] One example of an updated approach Ronald Bonica
- Re: [oam] One example of an updated approach Fred Baker
- Re: [oam] One example of an updated approach Ronald Bonica