[oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (oauth-parameters)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Tue, 06 April 2021 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEA43A3243 for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id spqwc7Ms3DYb for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A96573A323F for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 14:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60790E5F1A; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 21:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5C97F20A2F; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 21:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: "Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-22207-1615946310-719.1191719-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1191719@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22207-1615946310-719.1191719-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-2282-1617745793-592.1191719-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1191719
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org, hannes.tschofenig@arm.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 21:49:53 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/5eRIDbW1R9jsMTt5jnFhgWXLS1s>
Subject: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (oauth-parameters)
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 21:49:58 -0000

Hi Hannes,

Resending this message:

Should this name be changed to "client-rs response"?

thanks,
Amanda

On Tue Mar 23 19:55:34 2021, amanda.baber wrote:
> Hi Hannes,
> 
> A response from Francesca Palombini:
> 
> ===
> 
> The reasoning behind using "rs-client response" is that we were
> implicitly indicating the direction of the response (from the resource
> server to the client). We can definitely change to "client-rs
> response" if the expert and my co-authors agree that it's a better
> choice.
> 
> ===
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> 
> On Tue Mar 23 08:15:27 2021, Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com wrote:
> > Hi Amanda,
> >
> > I also reviewed the request for adding the nonce1, nonce2,
> > ace_client_recipientid, and ace_server_recipientid parameters to the
> > OAuth parameter registry.
> >
> > I am only wondering about the names for the parameter location. The
> > communication between the client and the resource server is typically
> > referred to as the protected resource request and response.
> >
> > In the IANA registration request the parameter location is called
> > "client-rs request" while the response is called "rs-client
> > response".
> > I would have expected to see a "client-rs response" instead of the
> > "rs-client response".
> >
> > Ciao
> > Hannes
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: oauth-ext-review <oauth-ext-review-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf
> > Of Amanda Baber via RT
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 3:03 AM
> > Cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org; Hannes Tschofenig
> > <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
> > Subject: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review for draft-
> > ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (oauth-parameters)
> >
> > Hi Hannes (cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org),
> >
> > I have another review request for you. Can you look at these OAuth
> > Parameter registrations for us by Wednesday the 24th? This document's
> > on the IESG telechat agenda next week:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
> >
> > These are the registrations as they appear in the document:
> >
> > 9.2.  OAuth Parameters Registry
> >
> > The following registrations are done for the OAuth Parameters
> > Registry following the procedure specified in section 11.2 of
> > [RFC6749]:
> >
> > o  Parameter name: nonce1
> > o  Parameter usage location: client-rs request
> > o  Change Controller: IESG
> > o  Specification Document(s): [[this specification]]
> >
> > o  Parameter name: nonce2
> > o  Parameter usage location: rs-client response
> > o  Change Controller: IESG
> > o  Specification Document(s): [[this specification]]
> >
> > o  Parameter name: ace_client_recipientid
> > o  Parameter usage location: client-rs request
> > o  Change Controller: IESG
> > o  Specification Document(s): [[this specification]]
> >
> > o  Parameter name: ace_server_recipientid
> > o  Parameter usage location: rs-client response
> > o  Change Controller: IESG
> > o  Specification Document(s): [[this specification]]
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Amanda Baber
> > Lead IANA Services Specialist
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > oauth-ext-review mailing list
> > oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review
> > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are
> > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose
> > the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or
> > copy the information in any medium. Thank you.