[oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (oauth-parameters)
Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Wed, 24 March 2021 23:50 UTC
Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B013A124C for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TFrOkpMCqTVo for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05423A1244 for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 941DEE33D8; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:50:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8F41320561; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:50:14 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-8232-1616529334-911.1191719-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1191719@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22207-1615946310-719.1191719-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22208-1615946559-966.1191719-9-0@icann.org> <VI1PR08MB26399CB1C84288EFCD7ED43EFA649@VI1PR08MB2639.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <rt-4.4.3-21140-1616487327-1926.1191719-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-8232-1616529334-911.1191719-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-15474-1616629814-1749.1191719-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1191719
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org, hannes.tschofenig@arm.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:50:14 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/LP_JvFUDgCwppFUL0RMHsJl0GkY>
Subject: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (oauth-parameters)
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:50:19 -0000
Hi Hannes, Should this name be changed to "client-rs response"? thanks, Amanda On Tue Mar 23 19:55:34 2021, amanda.baber wrote: > Hi Hannes, > > A response from Francesca Palombini: > > === > > The reasoning behind using "rs-client response" is that we were > implicitly indicating the direction of the response (from the resource > server to the client). We can definitely change to "client-rs > response" if the expert and my co-authors agree that it's a better > choice. > > === > > Best regards, > > Amanda Baber > Lead IANA Services Specialist > > On Tue Mar 23 08:15:27 2021, Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com wrote: > > Hi Amanda, > > > > I also reviewed the request for adding the nonce1, nonce2, > > ace_client_recipientid, and ace_server_recipientid parameters to the > > OAuth parameter registry. > > > > I am only wondering about the names for the parameter location. The > > communication between the client and the resource server is typically > > referred to as the protected resource request and response. > > > > In the IANA registration request the parameter location is called > > "client-rs request" while the response is called "rs-client > > response". > > I would have expected to see a "client-rs response" instead of the > > "rs-client response". > > > > Ciao > > Hannes > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: oauth-ext-review <oauth-ext-review-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf > > Of Amanda Baber via RT > > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 3:03 AM > > Cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org; Hannes Tschofenig > > <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> > > Subject: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review for draft- > > ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (oauth-parameters) > > > > Hi Hannes (cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org), > > > > I have another review request for you. Can you look at these OAuth > > Parameter registrations for us by Wednesday the 24th? This document's > > on the IESG telechat agenda next week: > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile > > > > These are the registrations as they appear in the document: > > > > 9.2. OAuth Parameters Registry > > > > The following registrations are done for the OAuth Parameters > > Registry following the procedure specified in section 11.2 of > > [RFC6749]: > > > > o Parameter name: nonce1 > > o Parameter usage location: client-rs request > > o Change Controller: IESG > > o Specification Document(s): [[this specification]] > > > > o Parameter name: nonce2 > > o Parameter usage location: rs-client response > > o Change Controller: IESG > > o Specification Document(s): [[this specification]] > > > > o Parameter name: ace_client_recipientid > > o Parameter usage location: client-rs request > > o Change Controller: IESG > > o Specification Document(s): [[this specification]] > > > > o Parameter name: ace_server_recipientid > > o Parameter usage location: rs-client response > > o Change Controller: IESG > > o Specification Document(s): [[this specification]] > > > > thanks, > > > > Amanda Baber > > Lead IANA Services Specialist > > > > _______________________________________________ > > oauth-ext-review mailing list > > oauth-ext-review@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose > > the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or > > copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
- [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review … Amanda Baber via RT
- Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert rev… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert rev… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert rev… Hannes Tschofenig
- [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review … Amanda Baber via RT
- [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1191719] expert review … Amanda Baber via RT