Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-urn-sub-ns-00.txt

Peter Saint-Andre <> Mon, 01 August 2011 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCC711E80A0 for <>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.56
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.039, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FwPhlraoX+w8 for <>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EAA11E8070 for <>; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 08:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (unknown []) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7C6C41309; Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:04:37 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 09:03:20 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2
OpenPGP: url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: oauth <>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-urn-sub-ns-00.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 15:03:17 -0000

On 7/31/11 8:45 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:47, Peter Saint-Andre <> wrote:
>> On 7/29/11 3:07 PM, Brian Campbell wrote:
>>> Following up from
>>> a few
>>> weeks ago, I've submitted a new I-D to establish an IETF URN
>>> Sub-Namespace for OAuth (urn:ietf:params:oauth:*:*).  Eran balked at
>>> putting this in the core spec so it made sense to produce a separate
>>> draft for it.  I'd like to request from the group and the chairs that
>>> this draft become a work item of the WG as soon as possible. The SAML
>>> draft will utilize this to register a proper URN for the extension
>>> grant type and presumably the JWT draft will as well.   Hopefully it
>>> will be useful in other contexts as well (like the oob parameter that
>>> has been discussed).
>>> The draft is available at:
>>> Because Hannes originally wrote all the content, I've listed him as an
>>> author. Let me know if that's not appropriate.
>> I'm happy to sponsor this draft if the Security ADs think it is too
>> "appsy", but I think it's completely straightforward.
> Given the progress that the OAuth WG has made, the fact that we're in
> WGLC on two major documents, and the fact that the SAML draft depends
> upon what's in here, I have no issue with adding this as a WG item.
> Stephen, do you agree with that?  (I know that Stephen's away for a
> bit, and won't be responding for a while.  This can wait until he gets
> back, and in the meantime the SAML doc can assume that this one is
> going forward.)

I think that's a good path forward.


Peter Saint-Andre