[OAUTH-WG] Questions on draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-09 - token_endpoint_auth_method

Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com> Wed, 24 April 2013 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C6A21F8F18 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:17:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sd2p6WaCd9aP for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644CA21F8E79 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:17:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com []) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r3OKHK84018960 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:17:21 GMT
Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com []) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3OKHK97021313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:17:21 GMT
Received: from abhmt107.oracle.com (abhmt107.oracle.com []) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3OKHKfg025974 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:17:20 GMT
Received: from [] (/ by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:17:20 -0700
From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_30A9981E-8ABA-4B1C-BB19-41ACDEF631D4"
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:17:18 -0700
Message-Id: <53250C00-9D1C-4E81-9AD6-E12241B875D9@oracle.com>
To: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com []
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Questions on draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-09 - token_endpoint_auth_method
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:17:23 -0000

For parameters to token_endpoint_auth_method, the spec has defined "client_secret_jwt" and "private_key_jwt". Shouldn't there be similar options of SAML?

Shouldn't there be an extension point for other methods?