Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 24 April 2012 16:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554C921F879F for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ovp0+x22Wt0p for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA27421F879E for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [64.101.72.115] (unknown [64.101.72.115]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1455940058; Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:07:38 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4F96DA70.4020108@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:53:04 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
References: <CALaySJLy6jpuPqxQXfKfpx0TpcK1gav1NtcTOoh+NOr11JSCbw@mail.gmail.com> <4F8DE789.4030704@mtcc.com> <CALaySJK1ej_HkP5Jz26XT-KjULirD2iFfVOpRkHgPZp-CbJCrg@mail.gmail.com> <4F957EA7.3060004@mtcc.com> <OF3ECF645E.478720A4-ON802579EA.002D0B13-802579EA.002D8D07@ie.ibm.com> <4F96A99F.7010303@mtcc.com> <85556C53-99DD-47A2-A0D5-2F86DD2B668F@oracle.com> <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2FFC41C@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
In-Reply-To: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA2FFC41C@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:53:08 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 4/24/12 10:20 AM, Eran Hammer wrote:
> We've been kicking this can of silliness for months now because
> one person refuses to move on even in the face of otherwise
> unanimous consensus from the group.

Hi Eran,

Cans of silliness aside, I'd like to make a brief meta point: we don't
vote. So consensus is not a matter of counting noses, it is a matter
of addressing valid technical issues that people raise. I shall
re-read this thread and related earlier threads to see if the issues
raised by Michael Thomas have been answered, but if there are open
issues then we need to address them. Now, it might be that he hasn't
accepted the answers provided, in which case he might be "in the
rough". That's the chairs' call. But it's not necessarily a simple
matter of saying that one person disagrees therefore we can move on.
However, I think you know that anyway. :)

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+W2nAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxQyACgyCDPDrxbFKLcntB2uu8TF+Zu
F24AoIfDHW+Z88nE16Wt+iLn+Dqch50l
=5WMm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----