Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-threatmodel

[Peter Saint-Andre <[e-mail]>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 4/24/12 10:20 AM, Eran Hammer wrote:
> We've been kicking this can of silliness for months now because
> one person refuses to move on even in the face of otherwise
> unanimous consensus from the group.

Hi Eran,

Cans of silliness aside, I'd like to make a brief meta point: we don't
vote. So consensus is not a matter of counting noses, it is a matter
of addressing valid technical issues that people raise. I shall
re-read this thread and related earlier threads to see if the issues
raised by Michael Thomas have been answered, but if there are open
issues then we need to address them. Now, it might be that he hasn't
accepted the answers provided, in which case he might be "in the
rough". That's the chairs' call. But it's not necessarily a simple
matter of saying that one person disagrees therefore we can move on.
However, I think you know that anyway. :)

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk+W2nAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxQyACgyCDPDrxbFKLcntB2uu8TF+Zu
F24AoIfDHW+Z88nE16Wt+iLn+Dqch50l
=5WMm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----