Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> Thu, 15 March 2012 09:08 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958E421F86B3 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.190, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m6PySp1M8kmP for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BC821F860F for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q2F985rx011578 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:08:05 +0100
Received: from DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.94]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q2F983hE020551; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:08:04 +0100
Received: from FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.25]) by DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 15 Mar 2012 10:08:03 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CD028B.1FF89CB7"
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:08:01 +0200
Message-ID: <999913AB42CC9341B05A99BBF358718D0138297D@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABzCy2DRThEaT=RN+0dn5taZ_OVdtnwKWgd3SEJ3NGH9Miwn6Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
Thread-Index: Ac0CiGhNzxZc/mxIRfikRq37d7nFewAAoGeA
References: <B327D847-B059-41D7-A468-8B8A5DB8BFCE@gmx.net><4F60FEDF.1030600@alcatel-lucent.com><B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E73C081C3D@BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CABzCy2DRThEaT=RN+0dn5taZ_OVdtnwKWgd3SEJ3NGH9Miwn6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
To: ext Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Mar 2012 09:08:03.0496 (UTC) FILETIME=[20A44A80:01CD028B]
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 22611
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1331802485-000033AC-6E48C113/0-0/0-0
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 09:08:10 -0000
Hi Nat, We currently have 5 new items proposed for the new charter. That's quite a lot and I expect resistance from the IESG (given our previous history of being somewhat slow with our work). If you want a new item something else has to be dropped instead. Anything you do not find as important as the draft you mention below? Ciao Hannes From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Nat Sakimura Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:47 AM To: Anthony Nadalin Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Looks good but I would like the group to consider the capability of signing the request to be added. See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl-01 It basically adds capability of signing the request in the form of JWS. =nat On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com> wrote: Agree contents looks good Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Igor Faynberg Sent: 3/14/2012 4:26 PM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Looks good and comprehensive to me. Igor On 3/14/2012 4:21 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > So, here is a proposal: > > ------- > > Web Authorization Protocol (oauth) > > Description of Working Group > > The Web Authorization (OAuth) protocol allows a user to grant > a third-party Web site or application access to the user's protected > resources, without necessarily revealing their long-term credentials, > or even their identity. For example, a photo-sharing site that supports > OAuth could allow its users to use a third-party printing Web site to > print their private pictures, without allowing the printing site to > gain full control of the user's account and without having the user > sharing his or her photo-sharing sites' long-term credential with the > printing site. > > The OAuth protocol suite encompasses > * a procedure for allowing a client to discover a resource server, > * a protocol for obtaining authorization tokens from an authorization > server with the resource owner's consent, > * protocols for presenting these authorization tokens to protected > resources for access to a resource, and > * consequently for sharing data in a security and privacy respective way. > > In April 2010 the OAuth 1.0 specification, documenting pre-IETF work, > was published as an informational document (RFC 5849). With the > completion of OAuth 1.0 the working group started their work on OAuth 2.0 > to incorporate implementation experience with version 1.0, additional > use cases, and various other security, readability, and interoperability > improvements. An extensive security analysis was conducted and the result > is available as a stand-alone document offering guidance for audiences > beyond the community of protocol implementers. > > The working group also developed security schemes for presenting authorization > tokens to access a protected resource. This led to the publication of > the bearer token as well as the message authentication code (MAC) access > authentication specification. > > OAuth 2.0 added the ability to trade a SAML assertion against an OAUTH token with > the SAML 2.0 bearer assertion profile. This offers interworking with existing > identity management solutions, in particular SAML based deployments. > > OAuth has enjoyed widespread adoption by the Internet application service provider > community. To build on this success we aim for nothing more than to make OAuth the > authorization framework of choice for any Internet protocol. Consequently, the > ongoing standardization effort within the OAuth working group is focused on > enhancing interoperability of OAuth deployments. While the core OAuth specification > truly is an important building block it relies on other specifications in order to > claim completeness. Luckily, these components already exist and have been deployed > on the Internet. Through the IETF standards process they will be improved in > quality and will undergo a rigorous review process. > > Goals and Milestones > > [Editor's Note: Here are the completed items.] > > Done Submit 'OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations' as a working group item > Done Submit 'HTTP Authentication: MAC Authentication' as a working group item > Done Submit 'The OAuth 2.0 Protocol: Bearer Tokens' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > Done Submit 'The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Editor's Note: Finishing existing work. Double-check the proposed dates - are they realistic?] > > Jun. 2012 Submit 'HTTP Authentication: MAC Authentication' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > Apr. 2012 Submit 'SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > Apr. 2012 Submit 'OAuth 2.0 Assertion Profile' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > Apr. 2012 Submit 'An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > May 2012 Submit 'OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations' to the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC > > [Editor's Note: New work for the group. 5 items maximum! ] > > Aug. 2012 Submit 'Token Revocation' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Starting point for the work will be http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation/] > > Nov. 2012 Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT)' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Starting point for the work will be http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-token] > > Nov. 2012 Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Starting point for the work will be http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-jwt-bearer] > > Jan. 2013 Submit 'OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Starting point for the work will be http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardjono-oauth-dynreg] > > Sep. 2012 Submit 'OAuth Use Cases' to the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC > > [Starting point for the work will be http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zeltsan-oauth-use-cases] > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) Chairman, OpenID Foundation http://nat.sakimura.org/ @_nat_en
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt