Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com> Wed, 14 March 2012 22:51 UTC
Return-Path: <tonynad@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0098111E8081 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.466
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.466 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5YvkpTygCAEf for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (am1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.204]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA97411E8075 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 15:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail9-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.245) by AM1EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.3.204.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:22 +0000
Received: from mail9-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail9-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17202E0531 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -38
X-BigFish: VS-38(zzbb2dI9371Ic85fh1432N98dK199bRzz1202h1082kzz1033IL8275dhz2fh2a8h683h839hd25h)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received-SPF: pass (mail9-am1: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail9-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail9-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1331765479274922_31497; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS004.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.230]) by mail9-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D33A480043 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by AM1EHSMHS004.bigfish.com (10.3.207.104) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:18 +0000
Received: from tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.113) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.7.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.4; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:14 +0000
Received: from mail90-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.246) by TX2EHSOBE008.bigfish.com (10.9.40.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:14 +0000
Received: from mail90-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail90-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4F91E0394 for <oauth@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail90-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail90-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1331765472414458_13266; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TX2EHSMHS037.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.246]) by mail90-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4E92C01B2; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by TX2EHSMHS037.bigfish.com (10.9.99.137) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:10 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.10.177]) by BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.97.37]) with mapi id 14.16.0135.002; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:08 +0000
From: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
To: "igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com" <igor.faynberg@alcatel-lucent.com>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
Thread-Index: AQHNAiAlqWkT0kJGqkyL+cY6VRZ7apZqPR6AgAAog+A=
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:06 +0000
Message-ID: <B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E73C081C3D@BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <B327D847-B059-41D7-A468-8B8A5DB8BFCE@gmx.net>, <4F60FEDF.1030600@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F60FEDF.1030600@alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [32.147.5.16]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E73C081C3DBL2PRD0310MB362_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%ALCATEL-LUCENT.COM$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%131.107.125.5$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%131.107.125.5$TlsDn%
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:51:24 -0000
Agree contents looks good Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Igor Faynberg Sent: 3/14/2012 4:26 PM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Looks good and comprehensive to me. Igor On 3/14/2012 4:21 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > So, here is a proposal: > > ------- > > Web Authorization Protocol (oauth) > > Description of Working Group > > The Web Authorization (OAuth) protocol allows a user to grant > a third-party Web site or application access to the user's protected > resources, without necessarily revealing their long-term credentials, > or even their identity. For example, a photo-sharing site that supports > OAuth could allow its users to use a third-party printing Web site to > print their private pictures, without allowing the printing site to > gain full control of the user's account and without having the user > sharing his or her photo-sharing sites' long-term credential with the > printing site. > > The OAuth protocol suite encompasses > * a procedure for allowing a client to discover a resource server, > * a protocol for obtaining authorization tokens from an authorization > server with the resource owner's consent, > * protocols for presenting these authorization tokens to protected > resources for access to a resource, and > * consequently for sharing data in a security and privacy respective way. > > In April 2010 the OAuth 1.0 specification, documenting pre-IETF work, > was published as an informational document (RFC 5849). With the > completion of OAuth 1.0 the working group started their work on OAuth 2.0 > to incorporate implementation experience with version 1.0, additional > use cases, and various other security, readability, and interoperability > improvements. An extensive security analysis was conducted and the result > is available as a stand-alone document offering guidance for audiences > beyond the community of protocol implementers. > > The working group also developed security schemes for presenting authorization > tokens to access a protected resource. This led to the publication of > the bearer token as well as the message authentication code (MAC) access > authentication specification. > > OAuth 2.0 added the ability to trade a SAML assertion against an OAUTH token with > the SAML 2.0 bearer assertion profile. This offers interworking with existing > identity management solutions, in particular SAML based deployments. > > OAuth has enjoyed widespread adoption by the Internet application service provider > community. To build on this success we aim for nothing more than to make OAuth the > authorization framework of choice for any Internet protocol. Consequently, the > ongoing standardization effort within the OAuth working group is focused on > enhancing interoperability of OAuth deployments. While the core OAuth specification > truly is an important building block it relies on other specifications in order to > claim completeness. Luckily, these components already exist and have been deployed > on the Internet. Through the IETF standards process they will be improved in > quality and will undergo a rigorous review process. > > Goals and Milestones > > [Editor's Note: Here are the completed items.] > > Done Submit 'OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations' as a working group item > Done Submit 'HTTP Authentication: MAC Authentication' as a working group item > Done Submit 'The OAuth 2.0 Protocol: Bearer Tokens' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > Done Submit 'The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Editor's Note: Finishing existing work. Double-check the proposed dates - are they realistic?] > > Jun. 2012 Submit 'HTTP Authentication: MAC Authentication' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > Apr. 2012 Submit 'SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > Apr. 2012 Submit 'OAuth 2.0 Assertion Profile' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > Apr. 2012 Submit 'An IETF URN Sub-Namespace for OAuth' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > May 2012 Submit 'OAuth 2.0 Threat Model and Security Considerations' to the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC > > [Editor's Note: New work for the group. 5 items maximum! ] > > Aug. 2012 Submit 'Token Revocation' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Starting point for the work will be http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lodderstedt-oauth-revocation/] > > Nov. 2012 Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT)' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Starting point for the work will be http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-json-web-token] > > Nov. 2012 Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Starting point for the work will be http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-jwt-bearer] > > Jan. 2013 Submit 'OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard > > [Starting point for the work will be http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardjono-oauth-dynreg] > > Sep. 2012 Submit 'OAuth Use Cases' to the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC > > [Starting point for the work will be http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zeltsan-oauth-use-cases] > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Paul Madsen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Eran Hammer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Re-Chartering Phil Hunt