Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: IPR Confirmation

[Hannes Tschofenig <[e-mail]>]

Thanks, Mike.

This is a useful addition and reflects the relationship between the two
efforts.

Please add it to the next draft version.

Ciao
Hannes

On 07/15/2014 09:46 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> So that the working group has concrete language to consider, propose the
> following language to the OAuth Dynamic Client Registration specification:
> 
>  
> 
> Portions of this specification are derived from the OpenID Connect
> Dynamic Registration [OpenID.Registration] specification.  This was done
> so that implementations of this specification and OpenID Connect Dynamic
> Registration can be compatible with one another.
> 
>  
> 
>                                                             -- Mike
> 
>  
> 
> *From:*OAuth [mailto:[e-mail]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Jones
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 08, 2014 7:15 PM
> *To:* Phil Hunt; Hannes Tschofenig
> *Cc:* Maciej Machulak; [e-mail]
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: IPR Confirmation
> 
>  
> 
> Thinking about this some more, there is one IPR issue that we need to
> address before publication.  This specification is a derivative work
> from the OpenID Connect Dynamic Registration specification
> http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-registration-1_0.html.  Large
> portions of the text were copied wholesale from that spec to this one,
> so that the two would be compatible.  (This is good thing – not a bad
> thing.)
> 
>  
> 
> This is easy to address from an IPR perspective – simply acknowledge
> that this spec is a derivative work and provide proper attribution.  The
> OpenID copyright in the spec at
> http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-registration-1_0.html#Notices
> allows for this resolution.  It says:
> 
>  
> 
> Copyright (c) 2014 The OpenID Foundation.
> 
> The OpenID Foundation (OIDF) grants to any Contributor, developer,
> implementer, or other interested party a non-exclusive, royalty free,
> worldwide copyright license to reproduce, prepare derivative works from,
> distribute, perform and display, this Implementers Draft or Final
> Specification solely for the purposes of (i) developing specifications,
> and (ii) implementing Implementers Drafts and Final Specifications based
> on such documents, provided that attribution be made to the OIDF as the
> source of the material, but that such attribution does not indicate an
> endorsement by the OIDF.
> 
> Let’s add the reference and acknowledgment in the next version.
> 
>  
> 
>                                                             -- Mike
> 
>  
> 
> *From:*Mike Jones
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 08, 2014 10:06 AM
> *To:* Phil Hunt; Hannes Tschofenig
> *Cc:* John Bradley; Justin Richer; Maciej Machulak; [e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* RE: Dynamic Client Registration: IPR Confirmation
> 
>  
> 
> I likewise do not hold any IPR on these specs.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From: *Phil Hunt <mailto:[e-mail]>
> *Sent: *‎7/‎8/‎2014 9:11 AM
> *To: *Hannes Tschofenig <mailto:[e-mail]>
> *Cc: *Mike Jones <mailto:[e-mail]>; John Bradley
> <mailto:[e-mail]>; Justin Richer <mailto:[e-mail]>;
> Maciej Machulak <mailto:[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> <mailto:[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *Re: Dynamic Client Registration: IPR Confirmation
> 
> I confirm I have no IPR disclosures on this document.
> 
> Phil
> 
>> On Jul 8, 2014, at 4:54, Hannes Tschofenig <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Phil, John, Maciej, Justin, Mike,
>> 
>> I am working on the shepherd writeup for the dynamic client registration
>> document and one item in the template requires me to indicate whether
>> each document author has confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR
>> disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78
>> and BCP 79 have already been filed.
>> 
>> Could you please confirm?
>> 
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>> 
>> 
>