Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-spop-10

Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Wed, 18 February 2015 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BDD1A89F6 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:29:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VWLxUHecYDxV for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na3sys009aog121.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog121.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3500A1A8A60 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:29:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob121.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVOS95mAPDoedUkykTs9mqW4gFjKardjs@postini.com; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:29:27 PST
Received: by iecar1 with SMTP id ar1so2600585iec.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:29:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KFe6lH9bKHDZX4nRwae55625eeIK//DlXmEz34bn17k=; b=LUuMhLaILD6UOpOFstLi0MDjDrRYAxCu2K4gSGH+Rb0+eYSqlODDpe1tmDetOEgfsY i8tWnlXQRqsdeC/07QSk0sXpP3qJwtIHPNgssC+iapK7MQk1WfVfF8Ha7cwExshNphIX j6zuMLlH/d278kgDO6MxbPwCiH+CLM1QgEQuPYkw8RtVJ1CV/JPZ/uCz6IK08GJeYgdO 5OW/dqnRtxgfSTEzu+QwoeDafe7mheu/yy77I35X9K5eN3yi3JJyRtOmnb3UuXRg74Pl 9XKriRZDzxyaG5MxwvL9++GxwQmHbNu8/hQKayakKHNzO2QJgovBLG+WPfI4JTixc36K 7Kdg==
X-Received: by 10.50.222.70 with SMTP id qk6mr3797678igc.47.1424276965988; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:29:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm02xjfdh3vt8m6B+lr0lWuiZIrcz5Vf2XAzMXmxDuifwaiD65OaX4fhyv2le8oghL1M01wnUFR5FzZQkEbA4C9URCrD3lx4QGvM+1tCX/PMG/F6QN2J6Oik4DIuTO99sYJLvhI
X-Received: by 10.50.222.70 with SMTP id qk6mr3797361igc.47.1424276962926; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:29:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.107.105 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Feb 2015 08:28:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <175D5D8F-05C5-4926-A44C-D01E5398E49B@ve7jtb.com>
References: <54E372C1.8040204@gmx.net> <20150218131359.19dae026d3e459813e21dc55@nri.co.jp> <54E450B2.7020409@gmx.net> <20150218182653.b84a14b8c26c3a506579692e@nri.co.jp> <54E45F22.8060902@gmx.net> <CABzCy2D1izfTA-ji28XX-rJg=BsSiXgnkNvCWn0Puz2_pCiG1A@mail.gmail.com> <175D5D8F-05C5-4926-A44C-D01E5398E49B@ve7jtb.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 09:28:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCRF5xt2mxDYs0H9qF4p+C6bKaMr4yAeu4jZdmfoL75kuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11344d8a83c766050f5f522f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/8q1BG44Nv4DSTVQ4JE7whiHFeQk>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-spop-10
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:29:45 -0000

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:38 AM, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:

>
>
> I don’t remember precisely , but I may be the one responsible for the for
> the 2^(-128) value for code.
>
>
The archives have a more precise memory
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg03844.html ;)