Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8252 (7085)
Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Tue, 23 January 2024 05:13 UTC
Return-Path: <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181A6C14F712 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:13:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Grbst7QkE23f for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B15D8C14F71D for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4F4424CD01; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:13:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SZio6aT2Sx4m; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:f406:294c:d9d7:bf8f] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:f406:294c:d9d7:bf8f]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65C26424B455; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:13:29 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220815072943.885FB4C09D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:13:28 -0800
Cc: oauth@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ECEB7F57-24E3-4463-9DAF-569BAFF85CB1@amsl.com>
References: <20220815072943.885FB4C09D@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: rfc8252@wdenniss.com, rfc8252@ve7jtb.com, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>, hannes.tschofenig@arm.com, rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/9NOYlxrJPepgLYIT1NZixsrnlxM>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8252 (7085)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2024 05:13:34 -0000
Greetings, This erratum reports the same issue as was reported in errata report 5848 (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5848). As such, we have deleted this report. Please let us know any concerns. Thank you. RFC Editor/rv > On Aug 15, 2022, at 12:29 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8252, > "OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7085 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Keepn <keepn58@gmail.com> > > Section: Global > > Original Text > ------------- > Apps can initiate an authorization request in the browser, without > the user leaving the app, through the "SFSafariViewController" class > or its successor "SFAuthenticationSession", which implement the in- > app browser tab pattern. Safari can be used to handle requests on > old versions of iOS without in-app browser tab functionality > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Apps can initiate an authorization request in the browser, without > the user leaving the app, through the "ASWebAuthenticationSession" > class or its successors "SFAuthenticationSession" and > "SFSafariViewController", which implement the in-app browser tab > pattern. The first of these allows calls to a handler registered > for the AS URL, consistent with Section 7.2. The latter two classes, > now deprecated, can use Safari to handle requests on old versions of > iOS without in-app browser tab functionality. > > Notes > ----- > SFAuthenticationSession documentation reflects deprecated status: > > https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safariservices/sfauthenticationsession > > Here's the documentation for ASWebAuthenticationSession: > > https://developer.apple.com/documentation/authenticationservices/aswebauthenticationsession > --VERIFIER NOTES-- > This sort of change to update for events since the time of publication is not appropriate for an erratum; errata are intended solely to indicate errors in a document that were errors at the time of publication. A revision of the document or a new document with an "Updates:" relationship would be more appropriate ways to indicate that the situation has changed. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC8252 (draft-ietf-oauth-native-apps-12) > -------------------------------------- > Title : OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps > Publication Date : October 2017 > Author(s) : W. Denniss, J. Bradley > Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE > Source : Web Authorization Protocol > Area : Security > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8252 (7… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC825… Rebecca VanRheenen