IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: jwks / jwks_uri

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Mon, 14 July 2014 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25061A0AF1 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tMxR5pwjjoap for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-f175.google.com (mail-qc0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED46A1A0ACE for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id i8so4104029qcq.34 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=ODmIOfIUTr7jPqSDc8B4BdCFXdbqBoCAdy5ztxrezUA=; b=Vv8vkpJhqfn9iC1fcSFvDhqT016GgdHSuBpGHRJ9KUBbTI6aFvhFKNqq1rqxAa5Kll 353RRfmBTcgbgrq65FvLfW2PlEQ5eVT7qZ+NXGZQZ7gIEGBeZzZf9hw94JMXSe4nFkLq Dve/Id33HD5HNH+MPONeeCW/tuKrNRD2Nr5JR5FclJYdupnX/IMZCvw+5HJyHPckFgV9 e1dtwGWyPfBIQiD8B2zavo251yWcMGDFb2kI7AzMMZcKr5WYJFlu1knqNI5MyoJikDUh a69kEIdAVwgjjDCtoUJfJdvYDtDNBp8dOWA8GdzZr0d1bBeOPSmoq+lrD1LkVlHuwP2I sOWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl1cY15sg3brVoQFW/bg01P+IOxZWuNGA0hafRQHu6kmXQW05nNnb3K/djTR2tJDq7cijhn
X-Received: by 10.224.138.9 with SMTP id y9mr23511999qat.22.1405369606899; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.200] ([201.188.2.251]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u42sm12155063qga.46.2014.07.14.13.26.43 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <53C4233B.7090403@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 16:26:44 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <892A37A1-BFA9-4EEE-818F-B98D9496CE61@ve7jtb.com>
References: <53BBDF5B.3020904@gmx.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439ADA0841@TK5EX14MBXC294.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <2CAA155D-E87E-4465-9110-C142D7085A56@ve7jtb.com> <CA+k3eCSmhKor+N-H8gt_GtQ7-4b1tVjS2n+hUpOmOawJWThBMQ@mail.gmail.com> <53C3A5F2.908@gmx.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439ADA8D92@TK5EX14MBXC294.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <53C41721.7020607@gmx.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439ADA9143@TK5EX14MBXC294.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <53C41A08.7010203@gmx.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439ADA9190@TK5EX14MBXC294.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <53C4233B.7090403@gmx.net>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/ADyhXL1MSCdHNGAG4AesneTMBrk
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: jwks / jwks_uri
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 20:26:49 -0000

If we can reference individual drafts then https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bradley-oauth-pop-key-distribution/  is an example of encryption to the client by the AS in sec 4.2.

If we want to reference an encryption example.  I think signing is covered by the assertion reference.

John B.

On Jul 14, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:

> Hi Mike,
> 
> there is no problem referencing an individual draft particularly when
> that reference gives some hint about how the stuff is used (particularly
> when the referenced document might be a working group draft at the time
> when the dynamic client registration document gets published as an RFC).
> 
> In this specific case I haven't even thought about that
> draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl-05...
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> On 07/14/2014 07:59 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
>> I'm not suggesting that we reference it.  We reference JWT using the language I already provided.  I was just giving you another example of a signed JWT sent to the authorization server, since you couldn't think of any off the top of your head.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net] 
>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 10:57 AM
>> To: Mike Jones; Brian Campbell; John Bradley
>> Cc: oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration: jwks / jwks_uri
>> 
>> That would then be a reference to an individual draft ;-)
>> 
>> On 07/14/2014 07:55 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
>>> One example is when used as a signed request to the authorization server, as is done in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sakimura-oauth-requrl-05.
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email