Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

[Derek Atkins <[e-mail]>]

We will have a WebEx available if you can attend remotely?
That's my plan, as I cannot make Vancouver this week.

-derek

Torsten Lodderstedt <[e-mail]> writes:

> Hi Hannes,
>
> I'm unfortunately had to cancel my trip to IETF-84. Phil will cover the status
> of the threat model document. But none of the authors of the Revocation Draft
> will be attending. So I would ask you to postpone the presentation of this I-D
> to the next IETF meeting as well.
>
> best regards,
> Torsten.
>  
> Am 23.07.2012 17:02, schrieb Thomas Hardjono:
>
>     Hannes, Derek,
>     
>     Would it possible to postpone presentation/discussion of the Dyn-Reg
>     draft (Dynamic Client Registration Protocol) to the Atlanta/November
>     IETF meeting?
>     
>     The reason is that none of the proposers will be attending the
>     Vancouver IETF in-person.
>     
>     Thanks.
>     
>     /thomas/
>     
>     __________________________________________
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>         
>     Behalf
>     
>         Of Hannes Tschofenig
>         Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 1:58 PM
>         To: John Bradley
>         Cc: [e-mail] WG
>         Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting
>         requested
>         
>         Hi all,
>         
>         I have uploaded an agenda for the meeting.
>         
>         I am assuming that all these items do not require discussion time
>         anymore:
>         * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
>         * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
>         * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
>         * draft-ietf-oauth-v2
>         * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
>         
>         Hence, we can focus on the new items. As discussed in the mail below
>         
>     I
>     
>         put a separate slot for discussion of the holder-of-the-key/MAC
>         
>     token
>     
>         security discussion on the agenda. I would suggest that a couple of
>         
>     us
>     
>         meeting during the IETF week to work together on a presentation that
>         provides some concrete suggestions for next steps to the rest of the
>         group.
>         
>         I also put the following persons on the spot for the presentations
>         
>     of
>     
>         working group items:
>         
>         - OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol (Thomas)
>         - JSON Web Token (JWT) (Mike)
>         - JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Mike)
>         - Token Revocation (Torsten)
>         - SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Brian)
>         - OAuth Use Cases (Zachary)
>         
>         Let me know if you want someone else to give the presentation.
>         
>         As a preparation for the meeting it would be good if you could
>         (a) identify the open issues with your document, and
>         (b) find one or two reviewers to have a look at your document during
>         the next two weeks.
>         
>         Ciao
>         Hannes
>         
>         On Jul 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, John Bradley wrote:
>
>             Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases.
>             
>             I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap.
>             
>             Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the
>             
>     threats
>     
>         it was mitigating.
>         
>             I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil.
>             
>             John B.
>             
>             On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>
>                 How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can
>                 
>         present our use cases and requirements
>         
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>                 
>         Behalf Of Mike Jones
>         
>                 Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM
>                 To: Hannes Tschofenig; [e-mail] WG
>                 Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF
>                 
>     meeting
>     
>         requested
>         
>                 I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer
>                 
>         documents.
>         
>                 I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer -
>                 
>     probably
>     
>         15 minutes.  It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG
>         meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs.
>         
>                 I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft,
>                 
>     but
>     
>         would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing
>         
>     15
>     
>         minutes for that as well.  (I'm not certain this will be needed, but
>         I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that it's not.)
>         
>                 Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver!
>                 
>                                                 -- Mike
>                 
>                 -----Original Message-----
>                 From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>                 
>         Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
>         
>                 Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM
>                 To: [e-mail] WG
>                 Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting
>                 
>         requested
>         
>                 Hi all,
>                 
>                 I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting.
>                 
>                 While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless
>                 
>     useful
>     
>         to hear
>         
>                 * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and
>                 * whether you want to present something.
>                 
>                 I could imagine that these documents will be discussed:
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases
>                 
>                 To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the
>                 
>     open
>     
>         issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress
>         already before the face-to-face meeting.
>         
>                 I am assume that the following documents do not require any
>                 
>         discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore:
>         
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-v2
>                 * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
>                 
>                 Ciao
>                 Hannes
>                 
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 OAuth mailing list
>                 [e-mail]
>                 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 OAuth mailing list
>                 [e-mail]
>                 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 OAuth mailing list
>                 [e-mail]
>                 https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>                 
>         _______________________________________________
>         OAuth mailing list
>         [e-mail]
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         OAuth mailing list
>         [e-mail]
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       [e-mail]             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant