Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

Good working with you and Tony is the stuff of dreams:)

We can sync up off list and try to reduce duplication.

Are we all at CIS this week?

John B.
On 2012-07-15, at 11:47 AM, Phil Hunt wrote:

> Sounds like a great idea. I can put together a few slides. 
> 
> Phil
> 
> On 2012-07-15, at 7:59, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> wrote:
> 
>> Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases.
>> 
>> I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap.
>> 
>> Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the threats it was mitigating.
>> 
>> I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil.
>> 
>> John B.
>> 
>> On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>> 
>>> How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can present our use cases and requirements
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
>>> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM
>>> To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
>>> 
>>> I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer documents.
>>> 
>>> I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer - probably 15 minutes.  It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs.
>>> 
>>> I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft, but would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing 15 minutes for that as well.  (I'm not certain this will be needed, but I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that it's not.)
>>> 
>>> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver!
>>> 
>>>               -- Mike
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
>>> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM
>>> To: oauth@ietf.org WG
>>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
>>> 
>>> Hi all, 
>>> 
>>> I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. 
>>> 
>>> While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear 
>>> * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and 
>>> * whether you want to present something. 
>>> 
>>> I could imagine that these documents will be discussed:
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases
>>> 
>>> To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the open issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress already before the face-to-face meeting. 
>>> 
>>> I am assume that the following documents do not require any discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore:
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2
>>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
>>> 
>>> Ciao
>>> Hannes
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OAuth mailing list
>>> OAuth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth