Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Wed, 01 August 2012 15:31 UTC
Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E351B21F89EB for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DEElNE-Mj+TG for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de (smtprelay05.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.99]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C7021F89EA for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 08:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [80.67.16.111] (helo=webmail.df.eu) by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1Swatu-0001UC-Hu; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:31:54 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:31:54 +0200
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
To: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
In-Reply-To: <sjmipd5i167.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
References: <09CE58C6-9409-4E28-B4CA-DC76C37B898E@gmx.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436672BBBE@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E7554F911D@BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <6DEBD33A-815E-460D-934E-A684AED2BA6B@ve7jtb.com> <FD90CDD8-7BC7-4952-BEF9-F29C282130E8@gmx.net> <5E393DF26B791A428E5F003BB6C5342A108171DC@OC11EXPO24.exchange.mit.edu> <50101C74.6060005@lodderstedt.net> <sjmipd5i167.fsf@mocana.ihtfp.org>
Message-ID: <5779a15a8c83bd9cb0626a5c933d3e89@lodderstedt-online.de>
X-Sender: torsten@lodderstedt.net
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.6
X-Df-Sender: dG9yc3RlbkBsb2RkZXJzdGVkdC1vbmxpbmUuZGU=
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:31:59 -0000
Hi Derek, I will give it a try. Where can I find the respective meeting data? regards, Torsten. Am 30.07.2012 19:55, schrieb Derek Atkins: > We will have a WebEx available if you can attend remotely? > That's my plan, as I cannot make Vancouver this week. > > -derek > > Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> writes: > >> Hi Hannes, >> >> I'm unfortunately had to cancel my trip to IETF-84. Phil will cover >> the status >> of the threat model document. But none of the authors of the >> Revocation Draft >> will be attending. So I would ask you to postpone the presentation >> of this I-D >> to the next IETF meeting as well. >> >> best regards, >> Torsten. >> >> Am 23.07.2012 17:02, schrieb Thomas Hardjono: >> >> Hannes, Derek, >> >> Would it possible to postpone presentation/discussion of the >> Dyn-Reg >> draft (Dynamic Client Registration Protocol) to the >> Atlanta/November >> IETF meeting? >> >> The reason is that none of the proposers will be attending the >> Vancouver IETF in-person. >> >> Thanks. >> >> /thomas/ >> >> __________________________________________ >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] >> On >> >> Behalf >> >> Of Hannes Tschofenig >> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 1:58 PM >> To: John Bradley >> Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF >> meeting >> requested >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have uploaded an agenda for the meeting. >> >> I am assuming that all these items do not require discussion >> time >> anymore: >> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions >> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer >> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns >> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2 >> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer >> >> Hence, we can focus on the new items. As discussed in the >> mail below >> >> I >> >> put a separate slot for discussion of the >> holder-of-the-key/MAC >> >> token >> >> security discussion on the agenda. I would suggest that a >> couple of >> >> us >> >> meeting during the IETF week to work together on a >> presentation that >> provides some concrete suggestions for next steps to the >> rest of the >> group. >> >> I also put the following persons on the spot for the >> presentations >> >> of >> >> working group items: >> >> - OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol (Thomas) >> - JSON Web Token (JWT) (Mike) >> - JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0 >> (Mike) >> - Token Revocation (Torsten) >> - SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Brian) >> - OAuth Use Cases (Zachary) >> >> Let me know if you want someone else to give the >> presentation. >> >> As a preparation for the meeting it would be good if you >> could >> (a) identify the open issues with your document, and >> (b) find one or two reviewers to have a look at your >> document during >> the next two weeks. >> >> Ciao >> Hannes >> >> On Jul 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, John Bradley wrote: >> >> Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use >> cases. >> >> I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely >> overlap. >> >> Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on >> the >> >> threats >> >> it was mitigating. >> >> I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil. >> >> John B. >> >> On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote: >> >> How about a few min on proof-of-possession >> requirements? I can >> >> present our use cases and requirements >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On >> >> Behalf Of Mike Jones >> >> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM >> To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the >> Vancouver IETF >> >> meeting >> >> requested >> >> I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the >> Core and Bearer >> >> documents. >> >> I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT >> Bearer - >> >> probably >> >> 15 minutes. It's probably good that we're a day after the >> JOSE WG >> meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs. >> >> I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the >> Assertions draft, >> >> but >> >> would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm >> guessing >> >> 15 >> >> minutes for that as well. (I'm not certain this will be >> needed, but >> I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that >> it's not.) >> >> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver! >> >> -- Mike >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org >> [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On >> >> Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig >> >> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM >> To: oauth@ietf.org WG >> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver >> IETF meeting >> >> requested >> >> Hi all, >> >> I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming >> meeting. >> >> While the next meeting is still a bit away it is >> nevertheless >> >> useful >> >> to hear >> >> * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and >> * whether you want to present something. >> >> I could imagine that these documents will be >> discussed: >> * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg >> * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token >> * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer >> * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation >> * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases >> >> To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please >> think about the >> >> open >> >> issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some >> progress >> already before the face-to-face meeting. >> >> I am assume that the following documents do not >> require any >> >> discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore: >> >> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions >> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer >> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns >> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2 >> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer >> >> Ciao >> Hannes >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >>
- [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF me… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Eve Maler
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Thomas Hardjono
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Derek Atkins
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IET… Torsten Lodderstedt
- [OAUTH-WG] Remote Participation for Vancouver (wa… Derek Atkins