Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-27: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com> Mon, 13 October 2014 11:18 UTC
Return-Path: <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DE41A035A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.578
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.578 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1I5jjmT6mAA4 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na3sys009aog124.obsmtp.com (na3sys009aog124.obsmtp.com [74.125.149.151]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56BC1A1A47 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob124.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKVDu1EW/wYA5KDEKlGIdSRl/W8eZtSgl7@postini.com; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:18:41 PDT
Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id a13so10022592igq.4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=okmGGVLsH5tPmofYoqLwMkASprRo3KB+GUAcFmxUMsc=; b=l/OvGE01uQFl1sLz0mu/jlgoRldPzc0hwat5/4cEBP3TFyts4i2i03UMR986DqkWOO uYosj1dBSIUvTKgBieo63SoAUe6utjAOaDf4B4nAL0KxKBwTuHmVXwqYH4SUKfzbudMc zKC/EefmChPYZQ7MIRIuyo5VpcTY1Nes5oYLLpJvvl7HqCbonBv9uDYdR/unqVW5lAmw 9DH5R8MRSXMVJpzy4zY9L1kPiDqs1Ofm1KMHQKUiiQ2tXHP5s9zVrlgmbGMiu58pojrZ 32QIsUz5mCnY0sWac7eIlrmxKJYQgO9QAvZ7+W1i4IjKT7+lodpAHyI/WNsdEwm63B5E bV5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkEWQMR+I7oofCkyQ2FW8FaYF7oTVa2mhMjchY9lWAWw/PWb0SkPVS7yu0MVqSh7bEKrFMWTJTQ5OfjQu/X9qY+LOvs9pAr8Jf2H1QJ+bBS6trZORk54us3/ol/5bzy0tMV43LQ
X-Received: by 10.50.143.65 with SMTP id sc1mr314259igb.27.1413199121112; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.143.65 with SMTP id sc1mr314237igb.27.1413199120995; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:18:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.12.137 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 04:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439BAFABFB@TK5EX14MBXC286.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <20141002025706.19368.2507.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439BAF0C4E@TK5EX14MBXC286.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <CAL02cgS1cJR9k6X-tPW27q=o=Hj3VP-sNRcY1t=Sdaqq0y+ryA@mail.gmail.com> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739439BAFABFB@TK5EX14MBXC286.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell@pingidentity.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 05:18:10 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+k3eCTtzXfq0VnFxiCWPWwXu8aLfLpePkgu2-8fkNRPVBBLmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1135fdaa9ad99105054c0f7c"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/CHbE_oCc_bWzuqXBIgpycV9-2Gw
Cc: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>, "oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token@tools.ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-27: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:18:47 -0000
Repeating the note about acceptable algorithms in the JWT spec sounds fine. On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> wrote: > > From: Richard Barnes [mailto:rlb@ipv.sx] > > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:37 PM > > To: Mike Jones > > Cc: The IESG; oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token@tools.ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on > draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-27: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > Thanks for your review, Richard. My responses are inline below... > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard > Barnes > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 7:57 PM > > > To: The IESG > > > Cc: oauth-chairs@tools.ietf.org; oauth@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-oauth-json-web- > > > token@tools.ietf.org > > > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on > draft-ietf-oauth-json-web- > > > token-27: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > > > > > Richard Barnes has entered the following ballot position for > > > draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token-27: Discuss > > > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email > > > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory > > > paragraph, however.) > > > > > > > > > Please refer to > http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > > > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token/ > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > DISCUSS: > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Section 7. > > > In order to prevent confusion between secured and Unsecured JWTs, the > > > validation steps here need to call for the application to specify > which is required. > > > > Per my response on your JWS comments, this is already handed in a more > general way in the JWS validation steps. Specifically, the last paragraph > of Section 5.2 is: > > > > "Finally, note that it is an application decision which algorithms are > acceptable in a given context. Even if a JWS can be successfully validated, > unless the algorithm(s) used in the JWS are acceptable to the application, > it SHOULD reject the JWS." > > > > I've cleared this DISCUSS in the interest of having this fight over in > JWS thread. But I also added the following COMMENT: > > "It would be good for this document to pass on the note from JWS about > selecting which algorithms are acceptable, and in particular, whether > unsecured JWTs are acceptable." > > Thanks for clearing the DISCUSS. I'm fine repeating the note about > acceptable algorithms in the JWT spec, assuming others are. > > > I would therefore request that you likewise withdraw this DISCUSS on > that basis. > > -- Mike > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
- [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-… Richard Barnes
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-i… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-i… Richard Barnes
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-i… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-i… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-i… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-i… Brian Campbell
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-i… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-i… Richard Barnes
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-i… Kathleen Moriarty