IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 21 July 2015 10:42 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB9A1B2D8B for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c80HV-6Hvf4L for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1FFC1A1AB8 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 03:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.134] ([31.133.152.120]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MaV3V-1ZXFUl3KXJ-00K6ME for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:42:06 +0200
Message-ID: <55AE21FC.1050504@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:42:04 +0200
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
References: <55A3C3D5.1020507@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <55A3C3D5.1020507@gmx.net>
OpenPGP: id=4D776BC9
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Tw7c4HxbNWW8xVXmPaRM40JG9cpKtlE4A"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uP7RBHpZ4n8nhhpKy5IW/IYCLifvWVvp1rIR6YXGbUjvOxXX+hN whDIwzjxTGsXCVQpr5gqGvyx2X2AqHol9g78sU3XLi+yK3fJGWFxi+O78ENb+bc4P2qYZRr 0Oo43fFtny9dXGTKYKbkuD/3bDqh4sxQKkKWg48elLPTmoQlLTE7ibuAZBZhHqLBlLq3A5f Ir6+Fb9zc7WOyThkMuSuw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:GrrNuLXeXsM=:b0ILMULHsui2dY8lAxI0Gh KWNdRS0mr75HBvyuCG7aNTkYHt5wz/YcePLI3COtGwHyv1PwOH3llfF79jNLLDx2LrZe30sXx DB0kF5WZoMT5JXLpSFmfdcVqW3q2AWC/58ulgsLt9jXeEoMZQVobY/PcuTNGbtVx9Tu/v+i6U SPjIy0DlVaAJnj1erlXRo9keWmIjOPYWUr1ZagZUb+mbhfplZb9Kf97O4c6UvNyAUNWNbaT// 2lvZt/h/Nhhs1A4j82t4f5CFkrgm/0yMrgLhXe3Y8TPWOQep7Y+n0kcSiRYFNg25IA9SrVooX SRL5BsRgSNfkARhefRkd9lWSxAUCZo7LiTkUEn9+5whUeZGrHb96bYcwCyuB5KXZX+I+gZjnI ESSBS8UcDbD7WX60kzmQEJxZLGRn4WEELS6XA5v4xrBr0IwObrWZfj2IwOJbNZoXPFqhZIa1U SvTtm4+dRlpQ8CH9gyITXHEfLdv+fg16jzTKUg9iBb/wtnlucV9BC3KIXoTpTJgv/lSOb1zJg P7FZx6XG9I7TrBzwtxdhYo3X/mWcqJ+NqpXp3pO4Onl0KDMVpGSG/Wy6fHbitJ/jFzpnkci0l iPOBURMXC1yvRdzoBugQ57MCbQbvn6V04b7EqEwWxIur+x/AsdDU7bJ81ZBzkXLnB7Kl/9Da4 EZSODDEKuWD8Bw69uwzOrZOYKFOJE6XcCroOsyafJ5nMVbA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/FbX8_RJUxP3fLxcW15a1t-9F2Ak>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Agenda
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:42:10 -0000

A short status update: I have added another agenda item about the work
currently doing in the OpenID Foundation about token revocation. William
is going to give us an update and maybe there is some work for us in the
area since it could be useful beside OpenID Connect.

Ciao
Hannes

On 07/13/2015 03:57 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> here is a proposal for the meeting agenda:
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/agenda/agenda-93-oauth
> 
> Let me know if something needs to be correct or is missing.
> 
> The priority is again with the working group items, namely
>  * token exchange,
>  * PoP, and
>  * Request by JWS ver.1.0 for OAuth 2.0.
> 
> For the token exchange discussion I put Brian on the spot.
> 
> It would be great to make progres with these document so that we can
> keep our good pace.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email