Re: [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-08

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Tue, 29 May 2018 22:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D23127871 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 15:13:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.608
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.608 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fzy3-l9QEwzV for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27CF8127909 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id t27-v6so14545265oij.9 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 15:13:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CVeWq6m4X31QiQs93hFu1uR0lfbUeY1yKQ/ZMDnBkp8=; b=nzYsJxU8aZF/kS7/BRGyITNgWMl2Q8xRW/9cxFoQUO3J0ktKS5LbkrZn87s8EEd5Lo PbVSxayKmmpHsTMSgYb70bPb3fxBYHR1cp47se7zc4EOiNCkYFR1cM7jsUQRwTUyp17L WfY6hG1TZn3qNYrDOyAYDn7SFBxiOdxlRJpRAnQzhrokZnfAyFkkM0/tV7Ld54EKstan /jzirCRUEx+kw5b5fM5nKxumE+ZkoxN2uzwENdhRA9r1A2b6ehm5H0A+Rxwm326luZe1 8LYJf4/Uy4ut6ptPt5/BRuHkruUCAliv3sqM1/mJtu8VwKvO832sg4+Vj9DiaFWHfngt TmwQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CVeWq6m4X31QiQs93hFu1uR0lfbUeY1yKQ/ZMDnBkp8=; b=WO2xqajhvu0lspuFUgfCBYBuHQCdczuCmfS6vhbbYeccnuXyCXZEjvLTVjwpZrML5G Ij46Te4HcFiX/WQK8uef8okFk4YRV09KrAKh+yt2Ca+8RfPBRHIUmnD4tnITUMqmWVD4 XqSK/PJFfREP7G3W+77WmLZhQL0elizu3jyl9dANAXc37d0hGViq0V9Qa9q3fx/tjEE9 SxGqSNWHR51flBAkb7z+RVm3Hbiz4x2tlHRLO9bQDNg/lqBYwXuZqXc9eptcnOsUh6aR t6jnqPuc8Yqq4KnVA4hgJevv6MlxYJl2wj9DxYg9rHGWWOeHGyQZ4dFPG7f+9JNLT4ta dZaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E2e5NFIOWj8v6plfk0bkWhn0PVQVRBGC6i+REyDC3mWIN1aXcRY TG0OMFK/H7ER+vaa9oaJ0os5VyDPZegO8u1xiR/4xA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKztKU64GzV+bInHHGrAWutU4coQNaBX+/OEu11RXLqjRPy25866YZQUYifb04XEDVbJrXftoewzMvGwDQToV8=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:3c8b:: with SMTP id j133-v6mr144513oia.91.1527631993530; Tue, 29 May 2018 15:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:ac9:66:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2018 15:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR00MB0296F09166551B8D649225AEF5890@DM5PR00MB0296.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CABcZeBMWdZ4q8N0X4QrGQhkEVs8_38Tqa8Fou+oVP1tYoJ0aXg@mail.gmail.com> <BL0PR00MB0292EB90294DE62DEF6BDF43F5B20@BL0PR00MB0292.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <CABcZeBP1JvFiMsx4ipR6bGCu219WHN+fFbufF3F_fhYFsP_WJA@mail.gmail.com> <DM5PR00MB0296F09166551B8D649225AEF5890@DM5PR00MB0296.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 15:12:33 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBP15tDGA+cHY3oQGbSUKCqUx-gHG6nnbQao6bbO_T0xog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000052767a056d5f8ae6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/G47uhrIX8YoJrhdOqR5dbWEatMY>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-08
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 22:13:17 -0000

LGTM. Issuing LC.

On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:20 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-09  Sections 5.2
> and 5.3 contain the confused deputy attack updates described in John’s
> response during London.
>
>
>
>                                                                 -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
> *Sent:* Friday, April 13, 2018 7:37 PM
> *To:* Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
> *Cc:* oauth@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-08
>
>
>
> Thanks for the quick followup. I will take a look at the next version
>
>
>
> -Ekr
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
> We still need to add the text addressing the points described in John
> Bradley’s reply to you sent while in London.
>
>
>
>                                                        -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* OAuth <oauth-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Eric Rescorla
> *Sent:* Friday, April 13, 2018 6:00 PM
> *To:* oauth@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Follow up on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-08
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> I just looked at the -08 diffs and I see a new section on brute forcing
> the token
>
> but not describing the confused deputy attack. Did I miss something, or
> were you
>
> still planning to add more text?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> -Ekr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>