[OAUTH-WG] private/public/confidential
Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com> Tue, 26 July 2011 12:10 UTC
Return-Path: <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C3E21F8B13 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.423
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.423 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.824, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hnr2a9lDVipS for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com (acsinet15.oracle.com [141.146.126.227]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB0D21F8B28 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p6QCAIO5001609 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:10:19 GMT
Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6QCAHKI015411 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:10:18 GMT
Received: from abhmt115.oracle.com (abhmt115.oracle.com [141.146.116.67]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p6QCAC0j012040 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:10:12 -0500
Received: from [10.255.254.154] (/70.25.120.2) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:10:12 -0700
From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:10:11 -0400
Message-Id: <18E17ED4-E534-4DE3-82DE-C067CB6EFF7E@oracle.com>
To: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]
X-Auth-Type: Internal IP
X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4E2EAEAC.000F:SCFMA922111,ss=1,re=-4.000,fgs=0
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] private/public/confidential
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:10:22 -0000
Looking at draft 20, the public/confidential (replacing private) terms still seem awkward. I still had a "huh" reaction. It appears that the major qualities are: how wide is the client distributed and shared and how well the client app is controlled. How about widely-distributed vs. controlled-distribution ? Other ideas? Phil @independentid www.independentid.com phil.hunt@oracle.com
- [OAUTH-WG] private/public/confidential Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] private/public/confidential Aiden Bell