Re: [OAUTH-WG] private/public/confidential
Aiden Bell <aiden449@gmail.com> Tue, 26 July 2011 12:20 UTC
Return-Path: <aiden449@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5DF21F86BC for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.506, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yzwo0OXC9CHv for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D208221F86AF for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qyk29 with SMTP id 29so228678qyk.10 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=eSz7iVO/LM770LTzlh0E+eGlU9mrMVaDMWrbc9QnrhU=; b=lk/MC9s7QV05qmUVwXiU3GCtr3Zhk8E9MS6LxdN5xTyPTuld3A4fCb0C1qk+nqm4iR 41vjUtFpfzi/GwjesOAVTn33H9QdDUSuVpXsEOArcSjooAkYKQUojisjTZfloMJDZnuL z5k0Yanse2hLfNH02S/XR0sbDx6+VF6gVPr5c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.79.20 with SMTP id n20mr4265343qck.275.1311682833546; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.14.42 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <18E17ED4-E534-4DE3-82DE-C067CB6EFF7E@oracle.com>
References: <18E17ED4-E534-4DE3-82DE-C067CB6EFF7E@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 13:20:33 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+5SmTVOLWt2_Wj7szScC+XxhL2M+saTow53t3OuYvRa7g88oA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Aiden Bell <aiden449@gmail.com>
To: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00163646d9b359ffaf04a8f7f502"
Cc: OAuth WG <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] private/public/confidential
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 12:20:37 -0000
Or even: closed-systems and open-systems, though "open" has alot of baggage. On 26 July 2011 13:10, Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com> wrote: > Looking at draft 20, the public/confidential (replacing private) terms > still seem awkward. I still had a "huh" reaction. > > It appears that the major qualities are: how wide is the client > distributed and shared and how well the client app is controlled. > > How about widely-distributed vs. controlled-distribution ? > > Other ideas? > > Phil > > @independentid > www.independentid.com > phil.hunt@oracle.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Never send sensitive or private information via email unless it is encrypted. http://www.gnupg.org
- [OAUTH-WG] private/public/confidential Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] private/public/confidential Aiden Bell