Re: [OAUTH-WG] New draft process / editor role

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 10 June 2012 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E81021F844E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GoJ6Bq6o8CjR for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 1113A21F8474 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 10:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2012 17:11:11 -0000
Received: from a88-115-216-191.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.104]) [88.115.216.191] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 10 Jun 2012 19:11:11 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18AjdB+GmYA/d3z4OYY+w/xTdg8ikzr3TFsBNT3YD 6sHO4Jneh95IP4
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201068743@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 20:11:10 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2E3D9844-8F6E-48F3-B386-2E437C522B7D@gmx.net>
References: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201068743@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
To: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>, "oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New draft process / editor role
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:11:25 -0000

Hi Eran, Hi all, 

The story is fairly simple: We have three authors on draft-ietf-oauth-v2. Having more than one author is helpful in case others are busy.

We had open issues with the document and we discussed them on the list. Text was proposed and feedback was provided to the list. Thanks everyone for providing constructive input. 

The step that happens afterwards is to create a new snapshot of the document. This helps everyone to know what the latest status is (in case you are not following all the mail discussions). We are also able to let IESG members to clear their DISCUSSes. 

All this work helps us to get closer to completion and I believe we are getting closer. Unfortunately, there is still one other issue that Julian raised after the ABNF text was published, see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09164.html. I am planning to distribute a separate mail to raise awareness and to solicit feedback. 

We are in the final stages of getting the document published. It would be great if everyone works together to get the work done as quickly as possible. Is this possible?

Ciao
Hannes