Re: [OAUTH-WG] New draft process / editor role

Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com> Sat, 09 June 2012 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C733121F863F for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id atHg1h5VVZzj for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5625F21F8573 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so3929123pbc.31 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=ljiK45OcZzdBmfufD3u9zN5NrY94GlAggXY+OGvSrGo=; b=pySVpVXiF0MLzLd+OGuTZBhEVAsm2zixI652W4EsYMzfOsUBCFaU4bDtwwDFO0A7ri HfGyGkT8uzPxG/rtxxlA8ccLYOhdaHOLu2jvnc1z3hpNOE8Nr/SowJd9aH7UYl+1yL1b hqs3yvIY7bKRExHZGhS3dOn1JbxtZY6UcoJJmek1fD3Qs302hI3FjE6V9nJiZEUf97/7 hOLF1hiG5UC61+WFX92IJMFiJeWLpMIXBeynDgLCjvcX4IiMZYYAXy7d7yhGyvc1FGlH uvhPDp3mjoiZwojZAM7rxEyWqUYKCnF546YHJiCEgFj2bRq8eyB+i3A0Ca/IYnD07jfJ LGUQ==
Received: by 10.68.223.129 with SMTP id qu1mr9327433pbc.165.1339274999118; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.4] (c-24-5-69-173.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.69.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rd7sm12465564pbc.70.2012.06.09.13.49.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FD3B00D.3080800@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:49:55 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4AA07FCF-5C20-401B-B7D6-F741F3E269CA@gmail.com>
References: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201068743@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <138877F6-BDF5-4EE1-9934-A40B7450EAF8@gmail.com> <4FD3B00D.3080800@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New draft process / editor role
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:49:59 -0000

On Jun 9, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:

> On 6/9/12 12:56 AM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>> Mike emailed me the draft and asked if I would publish it.
>> I reviewed the draft and I thought it captured consensus.
> 
> Chairs call consensus.

Agreed. I thought it captured the consensus that Hannes was referring to when he asked the edits to be published.

> 
>> I noted that Hannes had asked Eran to publish the edits a week ago
>> There have been numerous indications that Eran has lost interest in
>> continuing as editor. Eg. his decision to discontinue his work on the
>> MAC spec.
> 
> Okay, but why wasn't Eran at least informed, given that he had *not*
> announced that he would no longer be editing this document?  This sounds
> like a bobble by the chairs and a possible overreach by you, and this is
> something that should be brought to the attention of the working group
> (i.e. the legitimacy of this version of the document is, well,
> questionable) but resolved offline by the chairs and editors.  A public
> apology wouldn't be a terrible thing, either.

I was responding to a request to publish the version from Mike and had the impression this was what the chairs wanted.
I apologize for all the confusion this has caused. 

-- Dick