[OAUTH-WG] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Please find below a couple of non-blocking COMMENTs.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==
Should the document shepherd's write-up be updated ? It is dated October
2016... about 4 years ago.

-- Section 5.2 --
Based on the long history of this document, is the following statement "Many
phones in the market as of this writing still"  still valid ?

-- Section 5.2.1 --
Suggest to give a hint about the use of tfp.example.org (TFP is expanded only
in section 10.2).

== NITS ==

Please check the ID-NITS at
https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26.txt