Re: [OAUTH-WG] DPoP - Downgrades, Transitional Rollout & Mixed Token Type Deployments

Nov Matake <matake@gmail.com> Sun, 07 June 2020 03:41 UTC

Return-Path: <matake@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67483A094A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 20:41:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X-FjOn_RoajN for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 20:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F123A0948 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 20:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id t7so7141894pgt.3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 20:41:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Oq6NNXkh2Nepekthagj8DSiKE5mUv3iOPYmDDQDeWjc=; b=XmjqRZt8vVZQL3WdQ6G4itqGhItc/x1NLPOr9I7rTwnzsfCQhUliXRFo/OpyY75XpQ vbxm7y+FijlIYpf+RZizcRPGEs+bnEXG3lHRLnKU9+xzaGrCB279//X4E8NU5TQ5vpwq BMP9g7hzEYbsJ1Omxu0g3/L6zpobRLrEepuOl54sXiKPIobEAgKML/ohnrOHoM/mgiEP /+AAktaX0pxtIA4FEzkcwUvIXtBadG8EaOS1utAxFXMmm9gf09nmQI5P/QM05851l+de 2EiHLOGhsPz35mal/zygf57wbJpQQEUoVnYboBF0w5lclAk9dC4j6RT7+9DdgbVIXmT2 sQbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Oq6NNXkh2Nepekthagj8DSiKE5mUv3iOPYmDDQDeWjc=; b=sTxJC8YjVlkH3kyzzrvL1Kyh5Qb/k1ql1a3GdXf5JPZBpYceoAK68ghQSILcZ+vRwh u5y9dz2yUsBuqoKxDSnZErbqOZzIfO+gLl7UXw5aAFU7/R9FWt6hfDUJPRjIpflLJQ3P sF30J5yz668twTMssS7eIEy+eKZJCu4oamwELmC5xYTJLI7sHNWo3xBaVyjodFGoHpr+ JO+rKNCN45PtM648n2NmWp+BSHYw6FdwIb0WWmbnHBYwxW/jM3gfqlYnh1IqZaX++pwL SzckbOAqzrsjO2JEOrdKSpQ0QW55AOOyfRSWcSI3OYOiXnymxx9Prj8/9mq3qep+qNFs sv8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531UFxUDgo4DhkOSZ8E+sw7K/FYBhtInkuGGAVijF1snd4v5VP4D YU9GZLtefNX1m0uw9W998JwqnmAJS20=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyLTMCLtD6L3e6m5JThv0j+JH0kIFhJkZmYmFhxJrRRhzhvzbeA2CdTINi7RcXKBbJDC+KMQ==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9686:: with SMTP id f6mr2284081pfk.132.1591501313008; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 20:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.80.79] (122x210x153x65.ap122.ftth.ucom.ne.jp. [122.210.153.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f6sm3463159pfe.174.2020.06.06.20.41.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Jun 2020 20:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nov Matake <matake@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <AE6CAFD2-9A1B-4EEE-8F4F-5A1F94E66779@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_950E9EA2-34D9-482A-99F9-F16986BC30A8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 12:41:48 +0900
In-Reply-To: <CAOW4vyNXyCm65ifYQ97H1yySU0E-2n1xRPbAau8zLTubUxA+1g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>, George Fletcher <gffletch=40aol.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Brian Campbell <bcampbell=40pingidentity.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten=40lodderstedt.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: Francis Pouatcha <fpo=40adorsys.de@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <3e87e004-81a9-4581-9d21-93370e771977@aol.com> <E365ED1F-974B-4E25-BF63-AD55F4CB4248@lodderstedt.net> <CAOW4vyNXyCm65ifYQ97H1yySU0E-2n1xRPbAau8zLTubUxA+1g@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Hv8aLjtQUIygwwtBlavxjHoCV28>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] DPoP - Downgrades, Transitional Rollout & Mixed Token Type Deployments
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 03:41:57 -0000

DPoP-bound refresh token seems feature duplication with dynamic client registration.

> 2020/06/07 7:57、Francis Pouatcha <fpo=40adorsys.de@dmarc.ietf.org>のメールt;のメール:
> 
> 
> > Am 05.06.2020 um 22:17 schrieb George Fletcher <gffletch=40aol.com@dmarc..ietf.org <http://ietf.org/>>:
> > 
> > Secondly, I do think we need a way to allow for the refresh_token to be bound while leaving the access_tokens as bearer tokens. This adds useful security without impacting existing RS deployments.
> 
> +1 that’s a very useful feature_______________________________________________
> AFAIK a refresh_token is always bound. What am I missing here?
> -- 
> Francis Pouatcha
> Co-Founder and Technical Lead at adorys
> https://adorsys-platform.de/solutions/ <https://adorsys-platform.de/solutions/>_______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth