Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Authorization Code in rfc6749 The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
cspzhouroc <cspzhouroc@comp.polyu.edu.hk> Wed, 09 January 2013 06:49 UTC
Return-Path: <cspzhouroc@comp.polyu.edu.hk>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC7921F870A; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 22:49:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.372
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.372 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.226, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SARE_SUB_ENC_UTF8=0.152]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ixw2ziqPVlV3; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 22:49:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost2.comp.polyu.edu.hk (mailhost2.COMP.POLYU.EDU.HK [158.132.20.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B4921F872C; Tue, 8 Jan 2013 22:49:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost2.comp.polyu.edu.hk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B0A5039B; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:49:01 +0800 (HKT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at comp.polyu.edu.hk
Received: from mailhost2.comp.polyu.edu.hk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailhost2.comp.polyu.edu.hk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id R3Ym+Y1-TuWJ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:48:59 +0800 (HKT)
Received: from webmail.comp.polyu.edu.hk (vlinux01.COMP.POLYU.EDU.HK [158.132.8.197]) by mailhost2.comp.polyu.edu.hk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C172E5039A; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:48:59 +0800 (HKT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_a12d74b1654cfc6dec652402c6aa9444"
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:49:00 +0800
From: cspzhouroc <cspzhouroc@comp.polyu.edu.hk>
To: zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn
In-Reply-To: <OF09F85034.34A94363-ON48257AEE.00243414-48257AEE.002458A9@zte.com.cn>
References: <OF09F85034.34A94363-ON48257AEE.00243414-48257AEE.002458A9@zte.com.cn>
Message-ID: <435c62cb0612b3756dbe040fa1791cdd@comp.polyu.edu.hk>
X-Sender: cspzhouroc@comp.polyu.edu.hk
User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/10.5
Cc: oauth@ietf.org, oauth-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Authorization Code in rfc6749 The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:49:04 -0000
Dear SuJing: If it is the only reason, why we send the authorization code to the client directly and send another notification without the authorization code to the RO. This way can mitigate the chance that the authorization code is exposed to the RO's user-agent, hence protecting the authorization code from leaking to possible attackers in a higher security levle. Best Regards Brent On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 14:36:37 +0800, zhou.sujing@zte.com.cn wrote: > Then why not let auth code be sent directly from AS to Client? > > Just want to inform RO that an auth code has been dilivered to Client? > > oauth-bounces@ietf.org 写于 2013-01-09 14:27:50: > > > Hi Brent, >> > > Few points, why this doesn't create any security implications.. >> > > 1. Authorization server maintains a binding to the Client, who the > > token was issued to. To exchange this to an Access token client > > should authenticate him self. >> 2. Code can only be exchanged once for an acces token. >> > > Thanks & regards, >> -Prabath > >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 6:56 AM, cspzhouroc > > > wrote: >> Dear All: > > > > I have a question in the section 1.3.1. Authorization Code in rfc6749 > > The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework. > > > > It tells "which in turn directs the resource owner back to the client > > with the authorization code." > > > > Who can let me know the reason why is the authorization code sent to > > client through a redirection in resource owner's agent? Any security > > implications? > > > > Is it possible to let the authorization server send the authorization > > code to the client directly (not through resource owner's user-agent)? > > > > Best Regards > > Brent >> > > _______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > >> > >> > > -- > > Thanks & Regards, > > Prabath >> > > Mobile : +94 71 809 6732 > > > > http://blog.facilelogin.com > > http://RampartFAQ.com_______________________________________________ > > OAuth mailing list > > OAuth@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
- [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization Cod… cspzhouroc
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… Prabath Siriwardena
- [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Authoriza… zhou.sujing
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… Prabath Siriwardena
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… cspzhouroc
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Autho… cspzhouroc
- [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. A… zhou.sujing
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… cspzhouroc
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… Prabath Siriwardena
- [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Authoriza… zhou.sujing
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Autho… Prabath Siriwardena
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Autho… cspzhouroc
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… cspzhouroc
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… cspzhouroc
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… cspzhouroc
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] A question of 1.3.1. Authorization… Peng Zhou
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Autho… Peng Zhou
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Autho… Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Autho… cspzhouroc
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Autho… zhou.sujing
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 答复: Re: A question of 1.3.1. Autho… Richer, Justin P.