Re: [OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-11: (with COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> Fri, 03 August 2018 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60331294D7; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 02:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=kVmbNqGR; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=hWhr9FoB
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RxQ_0RWNbIoY; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 02:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B34F1277D2; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 02:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BE7278; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 05:17:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 Aug 2018 05:17:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HKPFpUW35xgnbMuTyyH2ZPP2aaWJs 1+Gt/3H4T1vQXE=; b=kVmbNqGRefCI9Nd/rUEGJ1EB9z73sAoy3h3VpoUUpYaO8 66KEmMBP5WoX4V9psIAepBcGMTUmB267TBsBkYyHjfwAU1WcHH4/gKWwjOy/qrx8 5YWYa/zjANLM8rpjK8PeBIuSEOK30imPz81o5+9d4ERMVaaIE+MFGy1Z1pRk2ZRi 3FBdXpBPb5TUA5Q9BSmUQaF/HTb39xzGcIUB406AYbbm+5ZVqAx3NxHFGCFYTCht rvbhOfkTICsP6mdjwGHMbm0JoRx+2L0OzoAGE5TuqfUvpvwZKL+XVaYJnwcDHUhn u22mA+BN6uHybtMS0RDXp2GkpvOARW4LHJ1Ns3jtg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HKPFpU W35xgnbMuTyyH2ZPP2aaWJs1+Gt/3H4T1vQXE=; b=hWhr9FoBV9H6NGehqUr69z 9R7/Nfy43YiAwGftq0I+qFG6AG5mDUx+KxA9Nary+NLf6wIU4KVYBm9qvouLcOci baLGWDLSHTxITI2CNGGOubnC8pp+cli+boEA5A/s/UVF0vRsotsyPyFHR4MVojNh MUsG3Uwv2Sr9VGCYfQvlAKFqioAXbkICM6EFrrDVhzx8LT2synZy5KUw5qyNdgai ZDpLUs+QLVz4xuHpPxHml/t9st81Z2oH10Y/Gqsg3gVGAMF/G1Uy69SYt7demYO7 R7owqedzfJ3KmrnwHjZqsa259Pw9kL4MJaYFppb5Cx/nbj0ewwE+k7ri7W4MHwhw ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:lB1kWy-zG-dHJ7k7Zu35jMZrbDoKIf_5oDQ28sj1r35i4gdb6vDFzw> <xmx:lB1kW8D0CB8uQqcRGLcAUFcYkjDNQLOkbe64wOjff1dNcbtRcqRxlg> <xmx:lB1kW_SEKsp1tTpOGn8UGaXMLShPLeYv4jsxUJ1ctE2h5PUemoQrSA> <xmx:lB1kW7vyrf__nO-i8Tetr4EGlAsn4jSf59bk8j7_i3YO2YMeancbKw> <xmx:lB1kWz3SkCGq4QmP7YeRLmYIbYHXVcY_PNbLXSZRL69TUmjenQxioA> <xmx:lB1kW633BY09aRA4FATeJUkjZz5NYtJQEZd7LiuO4VFX651X6QMhow>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:lB1kW6cwtyFBYyRa36FCU0OpeONMQC69BSFhejk4badfJffyeCwyCQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 710AA9E0F6; Fri, 3 Aug 2018 05:17:08 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1533287828.2924905.1462172000.7297BF9C@webmail.messagingengine.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm>
To: William Denniss <wdenniss@google.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow@ietf.org, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.ietf@gmail.com>, oauth-chairs@ietf.org, oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_----------=_153328782829249053"
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-2be8cd1b
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 10:17:08 +0100
References: <153288156357.7132.7206843681571127621.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAP42hCM2wnOs-pJqH+6=zHNEMtu9+wsTyeLgwx9N+yRA8CsHA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAP42hCM2wnOs-pJqH+6=zHNEMtu9+wsTyeLgwx9N+yRA8CsHA@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/JbmSxPKvKk3t0Wn7fKOdMYjOUxg>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Alexey Melnikov's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-device-flow-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2018 09:17:12 -0000

Hi William,

On Thu, Aug 2, 2018, at 7:18 PM, William Denniss wrote:
> Alexey,
> 
> Thank you for your feedback. Replies inline:
> 
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 9:26 AM, Alexey Melnikov
> <aamelnikov@fastmail.fm> wrote:>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------->>  COMMENT:
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>  ------>> 
>>  This is generally a fine document and it was easy to follow.
>> 
>>  I am agreeing with Benjamin's DISCUSS about amount of entropy in
>>  codes.> 
> Understood, we are working on this.
>  
>> 
>> In addition, the last para in Section 6.1 reads:
>> 
>>     The server should ignore any characters like punctuation that are
>>     not>>     in the user-code character set.  Provided that the character set>>     doesn't include characters of different case, the comparison
>>     should>>     be case insensitive.
>> 
>>  This makes me uncomfortable, because you are talking of case-
>>  insensitivity,>>  without fully specifying what it is. I assume that your advice only>>  applies to user-code character sets which only use subset of ASCII?>>  Because if you mean to extend your advice to full Unicode, you need
>>  more text>>  and references here. Can you please clarify.
> 
> Version -12 updates this section.  It now reads, in part:
> 
>    For codes using only characters in the A-Z range as with the base-
>    20 charset defined above, the user's input should be upper-cased
>    before comparison to account for the fact that the user may input
>    the equivalent lower- case characters.
This is much better, thank you!