[OAUTH-WG] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-11: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 28 June 2021 14:14 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response@ietf.org, oauth-chairs@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>, rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <162488964340.9518.9707742774515945903@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 07:14:03 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/MMidE1h9mNQTFpnrCqCWbbHcPTc>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-11: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I still believe that using non 2119 language (i.e., "must" rather than "MUST")
would be better for the privacy section, but won't block the document on this
minor point.

[OAUTH-WG] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
Re: [OAUTH-WG] Robert Wilton's No Objection on dr… Vladimir Dzhuvinov