Re: [OAUTH-WG] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-11: (with COMMENT)

Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladimir@connect2id.com> Mon, 05 July 2021 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir@connect2id.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1726F3A1BC2 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 23:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.338, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QZopiistoFTZ for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 23:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa06-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa06-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [173.201.192.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C82B13A1BBC for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 23:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.88.211] ([94.155.17.31]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id 0IEPmhVDgppib0IEQmpcnt; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 23:37:28 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=T9ZJ89GQ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60e2a8a8 a=+I3yL00+yDwT8KNLgfs+4A==:117 a=+I3yL00+yDwT8KNLgfs+4A==:17 a=q0rX5H01Qin5IyBaTmIA:9 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=9696KnHrJ6ieWaMQoC8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=mYAOWqAtFUkA:10 a=1dbGxDndw2gA:10 a=D8lnhvtxf0AONpHuB7QA:9 a=ZVk8-NSrHBgA:10 a=30ssDGKg3p0A:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: vladimir@connect2id.com
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response@ietf.org, oauth-chairs@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <162488964340.9518.9707742774515945903@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladimir@connect2id.com>
Organization: Connect2id Ltd.
Message-ID: <bab3c709-4efd-0c86-1901-37c93f252760@connect2id.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 09:37:25 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <162488964340.9518.9707742774515945903@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms040709000505090509070208"
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfLDIW95aAs4seR9YsAruvpnUbWI1+q/YOCOyOgN1U2zRkAogfLW+jc4gUA17VBXgC+4DcyJruJQ62cj1mFUwO8Hqz1N437IJI7LurygOtUO7GGqgIgXT xNidbn9c5YgHD14J+RO3L0AMpTdtox9OlR5y4jltwHeTnm0r+BPtfJwJb76FEx303vYrHlG8uSmp5ebtoDCJAo9udeOsW6SZnHyonGyHR8CyToJto4eIQNdm 3OtedpilS3WzCtZbo68fsRjuhVwdWPU0X7qVOikAPIBTUJ6XulCVUooQgE8tBDn1RlEk+w4vTzneOqFQWm3uExp5wV4tevsKNnQD0ZmhBym0cNR/AT/S4ys/ Pt8FZtyZzJqxJAt8GsXB+BeOGV9m2Q==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Ff3eGVVXn8q35lLGKRKtl4KcPug>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 06:37:30 -0000

Thank you Robert. We'll consider the proposed change to the must 
language in the privacy section.

Vladimir Dzhuvinov

On 28/06/2021 17:14, Robert Wilton via Datatracker wrote:
> Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response-11: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-introspection-response/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I still believe that using non 2119 language (i.e., "must" rather than "MUST")
> would be better for the privacy section, but won't block the document on this
> minor point.
>
>
>