IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Questions on urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob

Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com> Tue, 10 October 2017 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <t.broyer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9FD13243A for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7k1_xtCkJdh1 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A6A6132F2C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u130so45351203oib.11 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kXxKnXyz1GD+Hhjnt/SA9BuNWDFgrDhcBkTJ6hThNfw=; b=f1oQ57CmNfwWj6ABrqmF5OJIqf/+8ec41RnQJyi2jgt1SrBO2pevVzuj+pzpYX0ZQQ Fw2LhE0aKgwZCdAeq3n35vawwkXL/YOuVRr/ymWtoxn9ae79o5jEjq/JZq+6yapyzYAP nJOi6ApygODy1QoAkqxYmY2r8Zt95wZR4Xi7FQhYvrezM8/rqRYx6EOffp6cHSgUs269 e5uPHiGifVATonYtRQUHDsPCl77VBpHi1R62UwsuJUheANWI0SrW0SAuY0kNh8/BVdPK 6Y1/OmfpY0LWxYoEUU8Ac8TUOKHDtachJIUU3bfn6PqubSYLbQEpJ8UPoNNVvHdY0pA1 cQ7g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=kXxKnXyz1GD+Hhjnt/SA9BuNWDFgrDhcBkTJ6hThNfw=; b=q0Y8ci1qrga/zvstLFM1jACUXLmUnqezn8SBa4eFpCKjHmdPHSk4xvLkzsgezJ1XGG PGSTd1BlV+MU7zhnogyMv6QbwBB6fTSs9FEyIpErMA38/7Sf4D8GLVsqUPB15DV9uldl TG3SAvdSaEE32qgdeJcfLMS1jcKl2KwQkEizlqb6P5bfm361uqN5lPxJWLqZ5W+fwoQW i54G93sL+Rv1hVChlI4OfjoYLrP8Jztl9xL8VD3sAOh80y+akKJPazSpXB/WuqQ16w4b mkfV99DKqZ8WF4HK1uSZkfwltJ7TGKsV3fj1EFu3OUF6AtZJG2jYQbHnyrqkIacE0b9o saXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUcX51H0BYwu4t+UCMRTAv6lGaeZt5GwNgSggKe/AJ0IZqcXo2w JERcicdITkiSBB/YK+m1FND+U6f00MytFnLr+sniYA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBQRcXYxSmVOwDJCgjmFUWGhe4g9HBzPzBB3kIiRcWA4ko3xl2+qGT1uaz4h2pUVKzH8Xnx2bsAR+nByRaamOM=
X-Received: by 10.202.66.70 with SMTP id p67mr7350480oia.428.1507644287403; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAB3ntOvgXC4jWhGm7qNLSX94v35ZE7E0zy3Q0YZWOh-S+PRpow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAB3ntOvgXC4jWhGm7qNLSX94v35ZE7E0zy3Q0YZWOh-S+PRpow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:04:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CAEayHEMTB4Uv13a=nEKM_iPVjMdp4bz=LR1GKWrSBReWCGR+9g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com>, oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113dd27e32d7d9055b31cabe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/OCeJLZCEtNb170Xy-C3uTVDIYjM>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Questions on urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:04:51 -0000

To my knowledge, it's been replaced with RFC 8252.

See https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2InstalledApp (notice
the deprecation notices in options 3 and 4 in the "create authorization
credentials" section; you can find the "oob" URN later in the doc,
associated with the same options)

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 1:23 PM Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> wrote:

> Wondering if you could help with Questions on urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob as
> it appears to be an almost common usage, but no IETF documentation or
> registration that we can find on the defined usage.
>
> This has come up on several occasions.
>
>    - https://stackoverflow.com/q/46643795/88122
>    - http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/2014-May/001814.html
>    - https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/514
>    - https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09974.html
>
>
> Should it be registered or defined?
> (or am I missing something?)
>
> With best regards,
>
> --
> -jim
> Jim Willeke
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

v2.19.0 | Report a Bug | By Email