[OAUTH-WG] Questions on urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob

Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com> Tue, 10 October 2017 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@willeke.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FA21344EE for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=willeke-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jTEBT0aBA87k for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD66134CB4 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c77so42505100oig.0 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=willeke-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=a94JZsTRQZMiF54I4p1OV4R8brxDLmG+i2YDMt2tPdE=; b=WnXZP6HAJ773qKv7Fg7GPQLbtjGU2Yetkv0mmPueSM7SuoWkZaY0R/ZsShJutIhCkg +aexgoeip0o3WANhxay1G4jK//IBcCUQd3rvIJ1QDcC+vXvJPKzPkk4asqYj/xW63bRv Hskjvju5oLWSWGDr3i8882gWic/Z55Wr0kK2bElvWs9TVpjFUI3qJw1qtb3rFWMcjvQc r2xS/QEowKynV/IzFh61tO/6wlAgi4b5MpvGHmnRRYqZNnhvIg/X2q1UMmufoBnQSbso +Fz32OZFPG6XjQfIJ8xY4Zx0BTbshltRqw+AXsfbuROIYF0mPEdSPwRq8+H/oRF+OCAR nfUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=a94JZsTRQZMiF54I4p1OV4R8brxDLmG+i2YDMt2tPdE=; b=tk4FlolcjABe/R21AqY08ekwoGslY3i8bP2mDnrLn1ypnxJlM45qj9ncOwvWeAO4ou e4FwXJNBQz1dnP+mLsytISOFcfL/umKFZhLPHBHV2wcaHgkK1PD+v0lpdVDHmn2x3vgZ HhGqsohRhSZehmOiEosU/VjXsBHYzzqPJeblR6WpzpM0PXiHbm0/PQsErdXCNMS2E6Pf OYUaBaCwL17sVM5Bgp3v4g0dHkA6+k8eLbI385oq/fK1laHzTvjBsEy4o6bWHhB6tKgt /Jb7yZvLaoaNX7ro3BBDdQ02+1MwpAJserrn3C/5679GAkADrMWuhUrO4jNMp7BqkBrD q+Ow==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaU3Z5T5LX9+AQIoHvLQQ8KbEK9qTCsafWBKjljIlHYj6xt0CAXI YkncZ5TnHlUJRbyLq9EYVNVzDuk7OjWcnnv3tzLAYzE6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBUfwJRzkzpWAwRfBigqwyoF75cleh4n+4iELCWXAFEPfnsE4p/ICxYj+zM8M7elIIKkBLB3ciTjCRKlyNtQv0=
X-Received: by 10.202.75.2 with SMTP id y2mr6398081oia.56.1507634618504; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:23:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.19.211 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 04:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Willeke <jim@willeke.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 07:22:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAB3ntOvgXC4jWhGm7qNLSX94v35ZE7E0zy3Q0YZWOh-S+PRpow@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113e3db8e32ef0055b2f894d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/tW-LIPN_Be7SUsvlSX6JU_Wb7J8>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Questions on urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:23:41 -0000

Wondering if you could help with Questions on urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob as
it appears to be an almost common usage, but no IETF documentation or
registration that we can find on the defined usage.

This has come up on several occasions.

   - https://stackoverflow.com/q/46643795/88122
   - http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/2014-May/001814.html
   - https://github.com/doorkeeper-gem/doorkeeper/issues/514
   - https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09974.html


Should it be registered or defined?
(or am I missing something?)

With best regards,

--
-jim
Jim Willeke