Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7715)

[Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Roman,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7715

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php

Thank you.

RFC Editor/rv


> On Nov 29, 2023, at 8:51 AM, RFC Errata System <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749,
> "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7715
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Alex Wilson <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 4.2.2.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 
>   HTTP/1.1 302 Found
>   Location: https://client.example.com/cb#error=access_denied&state=xyz
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 
>   HTTP/1.1 302 Found
>   Location: https://client.example.com/cb?error=access_denied&state=xyz
> 
> Notes
> -----
> For query parameters, the hash should be a question mark.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6749 (draft-ietf-oauth-v2-31)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework
> Publication Date    : October 2012
> Author(s)           : D. Hardt, Ed.
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Web Authorization Protocol
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>