Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 15 July 2012 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA48521F8522 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LodMXEo3oEBI for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:57:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 99D9121F850C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Jul 2012 17:57:35 -0000
Received: from a88-115-216-191.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.106]) [88.115.216.191] by mail.gmx.net (mp041) with SMTP; 15 Jul 2012 19:57:35 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19SUmkk+mRSKrYaKXpDWRsaEwgMf5slLQzF6IvoAF xCK1r+JWYZtgI6
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <6DEBD33A-815E-460D-934E-A684AED2BA6B@ve7jtb.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 20:57:32 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FD90CDD8-7BC7-4952-BEF9-F29C282130E8@gmx.net>
References: <09CE58C6-9409-4E28-B4CA-DC76C37B898E@gmx.net> <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B16804296739436672BBBE@TK5EX14MBXC285.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E7554F911D@BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <6DEBD33A-815E-460D-934E-A684AED2BA6B@ve7jtb.com>
To: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:57:04 -0000

Hi all, 

I have uploaded an agenda for the meeting. 

I am assuming that all these items do not require discussion time anymore: 
* draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
* draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
* draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2
* draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer

Hence, we can focus on the new items. As discussed in the mail below I put a separate slot for discussion of the holder-of-the-key/MAC token security discussion on the agenda. I would suggest that a couple of us meeting during the IETF week to work together on a presentation that provides some concrete suggestions for next steps to the rest of the group. 

I also put the following persons on the spot for the presentations of working group items:

- OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol (Thomas)
- JSON Web Token (JWT) (Mike)
- JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Mike)
- Token Revocation (Torsten)
- SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0 (Brian)
- OAuth Use Cases (Zachary)

Let me know if you want someone else to give the presentation. 

As a preparation for the meeting it would be good if you could 
(a) identify the open issues with your document, and 
(b) find one or two reviewers to have a look at your document during the next two weeks. 

Ciao
Hannes

On Jul 15, 2012, at 5:59 PM, John Bradley wrote:

> Yes we need to get clearer on the the threats and use cases.
> 
> I think Phil Hunt has some though there is likely overlap.
> 
> Part of the problem with MAC was people never agreed on the threats it was mitigating.
> 
> I can present something or coordinate with Tony or Phil.
> 
> John B.
> 
> On 2012-07-14, at 9:36 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
> 
>> How about a few min on proof-of-possession requirements? I can present our use cases and requirements
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
>> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 4:42 PM
>> To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
>> 
>> I'm willing to do 5 minutes on the status of the Core and Bearer documents.
>> 
>> I'm willing to give an update on JWT and the JWT Bearer - probably 15 minutes.  It's probably good that we're a day after the JOSE WG meeting, given the JWT dependency upon the JOSE specs.
>> 
>> I'm willing to be part of a discussion on the Assertions draft, but would appreciate doing this with Brian and/or Chuck - I'm guessing 15 minutes for that as well.  (I'm not certain this will be needed, but I'd like to review the recent changes before saying that it's not.)
>> 
>> Looking forward to seeing many of you in Vancouver!
>> 
>> 				-- Mike
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: oauth-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
>> Sent: Saturday, June 02, 2012 12:46 AM
>> To: oauth@ietf.org WG
>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Meeting slot for the Vancouver IETF meeting requested
>> 
>> Hi all, 
>> 
>> I have requested a 2,5 hour slot for the upcoming meeting. 
>> 
>> While the next meeting is still a bit away it is nevertheless useful to hear 
>> * whether you plan to attend the next meeting, and 
>> * whether you want to present something. 
>> 
>> I could imagine that these documents will be discussed:
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-json-web-token
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-revocation
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-use-cases
>> 
>> To the draft authors of these docuemnts: Please think about the open issues and drop a mail to the list so that we make some progress already before the face-to-face meeting. 
>> 
>> I am assume that the following documents do not require any discussion time at the upcoming IETF meeting anymore:
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-assertions
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-urn-sub-ns
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2
>> * draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer
>> 
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>