IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token DISCUSS items related to errors

Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com> Thu, 10 May 2012 01:42 UTC

Return-Path: <eran@hueniverse.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A4711E80EA for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 18:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.555
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.555 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.044, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6bIcfB2Sja9Z for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2012 18:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plex2out04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plex2out04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [184.168.131.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FBD11E80E3 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2012 18:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P3PWEX2HT001.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.9]) by p3plex2out04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id 81iE1j0010CJzpC011iEc2; Wed, 09 May 2012 18:42:14 -0700
Received: from P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net ([169.254.8.88]) by P3PWEX2HT001.ex2.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.9]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 9 May 2012 18:42:13 -0700
From: Eran Hammer <eran@hueniverse.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token DISCUSS items related to errors
Thread-Index: Ac0uPyyFp+WxhSBGSfKzyUQ+QV5C9wASQ9wAAA6RlzA=
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 01:42:12 +0000
Message-ID: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201027144@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net>
References: <0CBAEB56DDB3A140BA8E8C124C04ECA201026E40@P3PWEX2MB008.ex2.secureserver.net> <4FAB1C04.80101@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <4FAB1C04.80101@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [64.74.213.174]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org)" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token DISCUSS items related to errors
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 01:42:15 -0000

I'm just looking at the parts copied to the list and in the tracker. I haven't actually seen much response coming from Russ. I did reach out to him directly to see if the discuss can be resolve without further action.

EH

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 6:38 PM
> To: Eran Hammer
> Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org)
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token DISCUSS items related to errors
> 
> On 5/9/12 6:17 PM, Eran Hammer wrote:
> 
> > All Russ was asking for is an explanation. Instead, he was told there
> > was no good reason and that it should be changed. That was clearly not
> > an honest representation of clear working group consensus from over 10
> > months ago which was achieved at great effort.
> 
> Was it presented this way in the proto write-up or verbally on an IESG
> telechat or in some other way? Just curious to figure out where things went
> awry here...
> 
> Peter
> 
> --
> Peter Saint-Andre
> https://stpeter.im/
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email