Re: [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use
Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> Wed, 11 May 2016 21:59 UTC
Return-Path: <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E8612D716 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 14:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjklNoSBp1D6 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2016 14:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EBB012D60F for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 14:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-x233.google.com with SMTP id 90so31941686qgz.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2016 14:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=wkaON4LRzOBw9hD0sCxIQ/dhUWS4Z1lW0M6D2WF4ZYk=; b=bG2e4CRW+4s15cYxU1D0RSMbW/D8GMTAOQa+J9OA1g+fMinKTajIRuKxBG1flo6M2F A4E6ijXIYSdFL0Tel0iS3zqVEPEwhFJe5wzBY6wV8EbNvP11TWuT4drS9z3niRU3R5yv M218evVX4aZkJYn0jHXcJ0G8P/fuX/eSd35WFN7QPyG8nkOF1RDLGv9691YEHNozYWTq 0HmNzEniBX7fn/KmJM0fU3UOvC+CavJRLVbD/X4mpuWpf/2A1N3fcnG+Wm7n9diLR4Dc DgbhKrHS6cBK9j/fUO0hfZ9tw3frpm/TbqXEB/EEKmrCg0iIkQVgl+P3n3f/Qx+ZVaog DiDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=wkaON4LRzOBw9hD0sCxIQ/dhUWS4Z1lW0M6D2WF4ZYk=; b=JrepKokxHn5OyFoIJ9uRKxPjHO6PytHiYLdgC0KvqZyCA1H0qzjY3q/Hu6Kz6HMhgW v3tgtql+UninetGSi1MBxYNWasd4eTmOSFPUyceGz30vrmqte9UB7gzJmkZ1FEPGOv2y MrhB/AfH7R4xW26yNlTlJUDJQ+zUYepTU+jSJjO7sg5Wqt18Ru6LKt8Na6xxF4yPJVm6 18YjpmvuGOjqnDPrtqHfmRgJcwbdb8QAtM6ncxrrNokFCslwq677hTcd2EgXys1EZVq1 ZsGGCayn9k5Flft+7Zqf+BQNo/xvQEBG2lqJKMMc8e9KbwDUhjvY4M19AQQpAyz/GOOL 0Nrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUQLNluUskYM4MarV96T9IyLVexe9jJoNewdzKxvsQoUma/+CVj9NGnbqPJvxC++/+gdCQic6evKOx48Q==
X-Received: by 10.140.19.131 with SMTP id 3mr6191267qgh.83.1463003980333; Wed, 11 May 2016 14:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <571A33E0.6070401@uni-trier.de> <5730D36A.4050601@gtrs.de> <CABzCy2Dqd6jtXtJ5tuAx6w_MUkBCz54RTGpd5h8K3W+WPi0jNg@mail.gmail.com> <BN3PR0301MB1234025C97EE6EE4832FC839A6710@BN3PR0301MB1234.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <5731ABD3.2070502@uni-trier.de>
In-Reply-To: <5731ABD3.2070502@uni-trier.de>
From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 21:59:29 +0000
Message-ID: <CABzCy2CAt04SHppwZLwb3eZbyZXJvBa1cirrxqMrYW6g0U==Lg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Fett <fett@uni-trier.de>, oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1135522a8d8b6d0532982859"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Y6o0E8CIBtxHZJ0nat1kwlWHGb0>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 21:59:44 -0000
Agreed. Also, pointing to OWASP guide or something for CSRF token may be useful. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:37 Daniel Fett <fett@uni-trier.de> wrote: > Regardless of what state actually is, the documentation (also the one > for OIDC) should make clear that the same state should not be sent to > two different AS, and that a state issued for AS #1 should be invalid > for AS #2. > > Am 10.05.2016 um 09:31 schrieb Anthony Nadalin: > > STATE can be anything, it does not have to be a NONCE so changing this > > would cause issues at this time for existing deployments > > > > > > > > *From:*OAuth [mailto:oauth-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Nat Sakimura > > *Sent:* Monday, May 9, 2016 7:34 PM > > *To:* Guido Schmitz <g.schmitz@gtrs.de>; oauth@ietf.org > > *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use > > > > > > > > As far as I am aware of, state was meant to be nonce. Replay possibility > > etc. were known. It is probably a bad documentation that every reviewers > > missed because they were assuming it. > > > -- > Informationssicherheit und Kryptografie > Universität Trier - Tel. 0651 201 2847 - H436 > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > -- Nat Sakimura Chairman of the Board, OpenID Foundation Trustee, Kantara Initiative
- [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use Daniel Fett
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use Guido Schmitz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use Daniel Fett
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Multi-AS State Re-Use Jim Manico