Re: [OAUTH-WG] Status of OAUTH re-charter discussion

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 07 March 2012 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1FD21F8599 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:45:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.882
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.882 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.098, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IiJM-ZOEtOev for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:45:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F88D21F8597 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:44:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Mar 2012 18:44:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [10.255.128.218]) [192.100.123.77] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 07 Mar 2012 19:44:53 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19bX8w4iGRb7/BPmW82yBEeCcFZeCNHPKRtpqtT/P pEJLn1zPIiqK9L
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E393DF26B791A428E5F003BB6C5342A1071D075@OC11EXPO24.exchange.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 20:44:48 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8A7A6A3D-06DD-42EE-818E-822DBD672EFC@gmx.net>
References: <5E393DF26B791A428E5F003BB6C5342A1071D075@OC11EXPO24.exchange.mit.edu>
To: Thomas Hardjono <hardjono@MIT.EDU>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Status of OAUTH re-charter discussion
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:45:03 -0000

I was planning to kick of a discussion next week with a strawman proposal for a new charter text. 

Ciao
Hannes

On Mar 7, 2012, at 8:36 PM, Thomas Hardjono wrote:

> What is the status of the OAUTH WG re-charter efforts? The last thread was back in October.
> 
> Will the re-charter be on the IETF-Paris agenda? (or will it be pushed out to the July 2012 IETF).
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> /thomas/
> 
> __________________________________________
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth