IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 09 May 2016 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF6312B05A; Mon, 9 May 2016 07:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JbUVoDqJKGbt; Mon, 9 May 2016 07:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (slow1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACC912B00A; Mon, 9 May 2016 07:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (relay3-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.195]) by slow1-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8176A47E163; Mon, 9 May 2016 16:31:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Originating-IP: 134.102.17.95
Received: from eduroam-0351.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-0351.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.17.95]) (Authenticated sender: cabo@cabo.im) by relay3-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B528DA80E6; Mon, 9 May 2016 16:31:35 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <57309F46.9040705@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 16:31:34 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kepeng Li <kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
References: <D356A330.34F31%kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <D356A330.34F31%kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/eGJpjDG5GTNB1lEADiZw1Ukq28k>
Cc: cose@ietf.org, oauth@ietf.org, "ace@ietf.org" <ace@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Ace] Call for adoption for draft-wahlstroem-ace-cbor-web-token-00
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 14:31:49 -0000

> draft-ietf-ace-cbor-token-00.txt; 

For the record, I do not think that ACE has a claim on the term "CBOR
Token".  While the term token is not used in RFC 7049, there are many
tokens that could be expressed in CBOR or be used in applying CBOR to a
problem.

ACE CBOR Token is fine, though.
(Or, better, CBOR ACE Token, CAT.)

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email