Re: [OAUTH-WG] IANA Actions and Shepherd Writeup ... Re: AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 March 2015 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734BA1A6F2D for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 05:00:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dlOdTvXO9Nla for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 05:00:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x233.google.com (mail-qg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE4BE1A0056 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 05:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id i50so1527133qgf.10 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 05:00:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=VlHQUfwh90VLpFRt/7Us3WWYavvAXhRpmb5wCdIGmq8=; b=0s6/7lAJ8kjwYzsbcmYrsw9Jm8CIHAZDglLEi3rHJ9MtluA56c8PGsEA8AEhfy5pPF xyE6pHfoL2fFk5dEGLokpeZmlh3XdhhM4rbdGkMRWgkJj2HbX8uU+oBIHQGRY/Xfoj5P MmbbOSaLL8z6CMWUscVTBbsHPnd+cqwLFy1df3sBfdjMyO/Eb2C2vlwBTJYlryXinY3b j7JniEEv52sDqx2W7GI3436aOXtHXkHQXk1xo78yWEwhINM7y15hPpMY6CZ4akuPeDAP r+Q4tWt3nyo6+L4ZtAHMgBHj9M7M6KHly1pUeOuljg6zc+fKY6Bq+7i/35PvZ4VWk9JK EZaQ==
X-Received: by 10.140.165.150 with SMTP id l144mr60037506qhl.39.1425387614039; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 05:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.3] (209-6-114-252.c3-0.arl-ubr1.sbo-arl.ma.cable.rcn.com. [209.6.114.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y69sm371432qgy.6.2015.03.03.05.00.11 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Mar 2015 05:00:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11D257)
In-Reply-To: <54F583CF.8060109@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 08:00:10 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4D1026F4-5C95-4237-9B92-ECD0413B55BD@gmail.com>
References: <CAHbuEH4ZQraLnWEeJAwqHq8mKHeeXWjMCA0QjY87pUjH3DKM9A@mail.gmail.com> <D1047922-A951-4DAE-81DE-4E663DD8EC59@mit.edu> <CAHbuEH4Hf4DaWVa4giqAriH0LNcxoZb9+Ha28+j-Q-410ASG1w@mail.gmail.com> <CAHbuEH7cm=REHDPA018ZaffCFhLqVbp_QmuE_tscY5ymy22kNg@mail.gmail.com> <54F583CF.8060109@gmx.net>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/faXXemNv60v_ltYour2tQ5KCZJs>
Cc: "<oauth@ietf.org>" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] IANA Actions and Shepherd Writeup ... Re: AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 13:00:16 -0000

Hi Hannes,

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 3, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kathleen,
> 
> the statement about the IANA actions in the shepherd writeup are indeed
> incorrect. I updated the writeup.

Thank you!
> 
>>>        IANA Considerations:
>>>        The shepherd report says that there are no actions for IANA,
>>>        so this needs to be updated as the draft is the specification
>>>        required to add two new entries to an existing registry,
>>>        established by the parent document.  It does require DE review
>>>        on the mailing list: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
>>>        <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
>>>        If that has been done, then a pointer to the archive would be
>>>        helpful.
> 
> One question: I was assuming that we would use the review list when
> requests come from outside the IETF since documents that go through the
> IETF OAuth working group get detailed review anyway.
> 
> I am OK with always dropping a mail to the review lists whenever new
> registry entries are created. Should we do that?

Yes, that's fine and is how I read the IANA considerations.   It does say a DE on that list needs to make a decision, so expert review is required.

Thanks,
Kathleen
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
>