Re: [OAUTH-WG] IANA Actions and Shepherd Writeup ... Re: AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Hi Hannes,

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 3, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Kathleen,
> 
> the statement about the IANA actions in the shepherd writeup are indeed
> incorrect. I updated the writeup.

Thank you!
> 
>>>        IANA Considerations:
>>>        The shepherd report says that there are no actions for IANA,
>>>        so this needs to be updated as the draft is the specification
>>>        required to add two new entries to an existing registry,
>>>        established by the parent document.  It does require DE review
>>>        on the mailing list: [e-mail]
>>>        <mailto:[e-mail]>
>>>        If that has been done, then a pointer to the archive would be
>>>        helpful.
> 
> One question: I was assuming that we would use the review list when
> requests come from outside the IETF since documents that go through the
> IETF OAuth working group get detailed review anyway.
> 
> I am OK with always dropping a mail to the review lists whenever new
> registry entries are created. Should we do that?

Yes, that's fine and is how I read the IANA considerations.   It does say a DE on that list needs to make a decision, so expert review is required.

Thanks,
Kathleen
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
>