Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF Drafts (Due 10/2)
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 21 September 2009 21:57 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE233A6915 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.864
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.864 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.265, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pJ6AIvl2uuVQ for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4B53A68F2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-247.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-247.cisco.com [64.101.72.247]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96C5A4007B; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:58:50 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4AB7F719.1020900@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:58:49 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
References: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343784D58457@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> <4AB7EF43.6010903@stpeter.im> <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343784D584B2@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
In-Reply-To: <90C41DD21FB7C64BB94121FBBC2E72343784D584B2@P3PW5EX1MB01.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF Drafts (Due 10/2)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:57:49 -0000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 <hat type="chair"/> How about Wednesday, October 7, at 17:00 UTC? That would be 10:00 on the U.S. West Coast, 13:00 on the U.S. East Coast, 18:00 in the UK, 19:00 in most of Western Europe, etc. On 9/21/09 3:50 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > Sounds good. Can you propose a time? > > EHL > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter@stpeter.im] >> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 2:25 PM >> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav >> Cc: oauth@ietf.org >> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF Drafts (Due >> 10/2) >> > <hat type="chair"/> > > On 9/21/09 2:40 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-authentication >>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-web-delegation >>>> >>>> I plan to publish new revisions of the above drafts to include: > <snip/> > > Great idea, and thanks for the push. > > To help move things forward, we might want to hold a real-time meeting > in our WG chatroom: > > xmpp:oauth@jabber.ietf.org > > http://jabber.ietf.org/logs/oauth/ > > I think it would be productive to do that the week of October 5, after > your October 2 deadline has passed, so that we can efficiently work > through any remaining open issues. > > Peter > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkq39xkACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzqOACgxBIydjERves0ZEF+ubvP9HlP 8d0AoKQWgn6GtKOnjamLMrHyAsvmFBiv =5DLQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF Draft… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Chirag Shah
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Hubert Le Van Gong
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… John Panzer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Chirag Shah
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… John Panzer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Request for feedback: OAuth IETF D… Igor Faynberg