Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Discovery spec pared down to its essence

Anthony Nadalin <> Thu, 18 February 2016 18:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0991B2B0D for <>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:13:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1E9ftFvDKhaF for <>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:13:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:742]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 943D01B2E7C for <>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:13:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=ki5+6LiRR6tzfdupp6COL++IM3ugKcWNCL0ZRLfiMMw=; b=HYERKRBDJ+TJlSMqwrrTbHthLxTXoegi6Ug9UYIZEqVzJOdqBGlhVZs1H4SFnR4BMWZQiWc6t6+OEhlHvZMVA32B24WEp2qUpAk0M9puMW/dUh89OeHNCIj54A3tz0uyL0JkIruYNYe079g/IUx3/fkAgqkdAfJ0vpAYyOU+naE=
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.409.15; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:12:55 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.0409.017; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:12:55 +0000
From: Anthony Nadalin <>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <>, Phil Hunt <>, John Bradley <>
Thread-Topic: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Discovery spec pared down to its essence
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:12:55 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
authentication-results:; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;; dmarc=none action=none;
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:e::18f]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 86074f06-9a3f-449c-7d6a-08d3388f1fff
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0301MB1234; 5:CVCUPSVgpuCbndtnc37u+TakisXv3Qhrfll5MfJKwRJtPUhpb1IGCL7Z+X8PJj9FkMxi6FGPn/0Pi9ajyEo9TzKVO4B6gpKXgAOnUPCi21FGFHnWuU6pyX0qVtKLoCMdAHJP/UbXV8e9O4t+XQSY7Q==; 24:Li7c2UoTsBW9sRkawqQTOKBNz6diJAjzhCssxXPrRV/stMyQvGCijeBO1GtoaO6g8HddKhaqpVDxv9rgAWjSpDC30pCKkrAsNwaok52EKVo=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR0301MB1234;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BN3PR0301MB1234; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB1234;
x-forefront-prvs: 085634EFF4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(24454002)(13464003)(377454003)(479174004)(86362001)(77096005)(86612001)(2900100001)(2950100001)(93886004)(33656002)(76576001)(5002640100001)(50986999)(54356999)(189998001)(87936001)(5001770100001)(5001960100002)(76176999)(99286002)(92566002)(5003600100002)(10090500001)(10290500002)(10400500002)(5005710100001)(74316001)(6116002)(102836003)(3660700001)(3280700002)(5008740100001)(586003)(1220700001)(1096002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(40100003)(11100500001)(122556002)(4326007)(2906002)(5004730100002)(3826002)(42262002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB1234;; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Feb 2016 18:12:55.4986 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0301MB1234
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Discovery spec pared down to its essence
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:13:22 -0000

I also think we are way far from last call (and surprised to see last call issued) on this document as it is still very complex for something that should be very simple 

-----Original Message-----
From: OAuth [] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 6:47 AM
To: Phil Hunt <>; John Bradley <>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Discovery spec pared down to its essence

On 02/18/2016 03:06 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:
> BTW. I think we are FAR from Last Call on this topic.

Thanks for your feedback, Phil. As you have seen I had issued a WGLC prior to your message based on the claim from the authors that they believe the document is finished.

We will, of course, take all reviews into account and see where we are with the discovery spec. I, as the shepherd, will also do my review and I encourage many working group members to also take a look at the document and to provide their input.