[OAUTH-WG] JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR): signing
George Aristy <george.aristy@gmail.com> Tue, 14 January 2020 21:29 UTC
Return-Path: <george.aristy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A792120110 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:29:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ss5pv6ELLr7m for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:29:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C73E120059 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:29:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id z193so15520647iof.1 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:29:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CmrYgO9XaOM4zls/KQoAvclhv3Obfcq0T6HTbLi1fUQ=; b=dQZtKFwt5ux8nnFT7S/8lnbCSBRxKpR0TcQ95AUcKj4so8qDUCEKtDZaIs6v29ju4k snUh+WZDYtbR3x1r5rCn2pllafbetTI5M8eIgzKQO+w6MbtYjtLKbCSj90cEGMXjxT9e 60PA/m5hf0cs4YIdoZSH6HlZTaN1ftQKBXCO5HqKOueuI6wcqc+XDqi3ZSlA53AZPK8i nBhDysQDYbrTgT/gyaNMhdhcQ+AE93Dckb60Tbj+XGAZMeO8wzQ+lVwsv9jx0ShgywoM H6E+1cUd/fgTONIRN2Dl1aXb1DsgypWMY+pJUYhDXuwHR1IHhMDlwA3sXMGpKem/N6oD Ek8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CmrYgO9XaOM4zls/KQoAvclhv3Obfcq0T6HTbLi1fUQ=; b=DmhNp3pnfR3mUDLQFklqV5UK7bo6EUDOMf3QSlchJ+mvGIFtuA5WSJcJCcgi1syDAa 6wp8DAn2pwBj3pOrknUYl0igpQahfRw4GsH9e9qCaNP3s+ZLtflvC+gQyWZYRY/Cj7Ya nSFbXcDi1hfdJckBaNLTOIksU1O1B81nB9GOjt8O86Wz7uqzPLP59G2Qs2cY4r70lDzQ an49T+CmvVJSvk9h58TvjFRnIR18PNv1JSXVQ19RQbqGFIvddSg7xg9HgAZp01cUeBDj Nc5tGBwy3w971j7wMdPb/8dKVjPA2HYdZAWiTmLclnWjUX17T6ZimJtN9YJo/ikhxWpR oAgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVx5bYiORzZJpMcv5KBrlFS8ezPPlEY8u/LiXQoPyPIYn1nYkHH OKeitwj8C2kHSjeJ9elTbuk8qzujulU9ll6QyW0Afd0LOic=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwSGmIG3F/3ikbBZGA6W9zGSFg/L0K6KKZTS51IGfDiuPgjSOv039kAS70PRIr/jU47Vrmi/FbeSTtEe8V5C7A=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8f41:: with SMTP id x1mr19861262iop.113.1579037390193; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 13:29:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: George Aristy <george.aristy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:29:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHhMjFUKoJaLFnYtPjDGKVyw43Z_YRDTL+ZLk_Ax8DHdhKMzBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bacb20059c204aea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/jNkiXmvg7NSnoZ_ypJPlXwJOKbI>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR): signing
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:29:53 -0000
Hello everyone. Is it possible to relax the requirement to sign the claims set if an authenticated encryption mode with prior shared secrets is used? Eg. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-madden-jose-ecdh-1pu-02. This would reduce the size of the request object substantially. Regards, George Aristy
- [OAUTH-WG] JWT Secured Authorization Request (JAR… George Aristy
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Secured Authorization Request … Benjamin Kaduk