[OAUTH-WG] Milestones

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Sun, 05 May 2013 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C3C21F8D2E for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 May 2013 02:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XMof3jQzpYGw for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 May 2013 02:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEFE21F8D27 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 May 2013 02:38:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([10.1.76.35]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LtTty-1UPCY31jLY-010xDV for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sun, 05 May 2013 11:38:11 +0200
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 05 May 2013 09:38:11 -0000
Received: from a88-115-219-140.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.200]) [88.115.219.140] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 05 May 2013 11:38:11 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+WnJRsfgCWGK1wZEJuWHONCC22DNkQJjRZYKVjSr xkkWemmf46zyLj
Message-ID: <5186287E.4020909@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 12:38:06 +0300
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Milestones
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 May 2013 09:38:18 -0000

I have just looked at our WG milestones and need your feedback:

* Mar 2013 	Submit 'Token Revocation' to the IESG for consideration as a 
Proposed Standard

--> I have asked the IESG secretary to mark it as DONE.


* Apr 2013 	Submit 'SAML 2.0 Bearer Assertion Profiles for OAuth 2.0' to 
the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard
* Apr 2013 	Submit 'OAuth 2.0 Assertion Profile' to the IESG for 
consideration as a Proposed Standard

--> We are behind schedule on this item and I suggest the following next 
steps:

   1) WG review for 2 weeks (2 weeks because various folks are at the 
Internet Identity Workshop in Mountain View next week).

   2) If review feedback indicates the documents are ready for the IESG 
we sent them to the IESG again.


Jun 2013 	Submit 'OAuth Use Cases' to the IESG for consideration as an 
Informational RFC

  --> Derek, as the document shepherd, knows the status of this work

Jul 2013 	Submit 'HTTP Authentication: MAC Authentication' to the IESG 
for consideration as a Proposed Standard

  --> The feedback at the last IETF meeting was good. We do, however, 
need to finalize the document. July is a realistic deadline, I think, 
but the document authors will have to propose a list of open issues.

Aug 2013 	Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT) Bearer Token Profiles for OAuth 
2.0' to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard

  --> This document is pending the completion of the JOSE work.
      Is this date realistic?

Aug 2013 	Submit 'JSON Web Token (JWT)' to the IESG for consideration as 
a Proposed Standard

  --> This document is pending the completion of the JOSE work.
      Is this date realistic?

Sep 2013 	Submit 'OAuth Dynamic Client Registration Protocol' to the 
IESG for consideration as a Proposed Standard

  --> Justin, do you think that this document can be completed in 
September or earlier?

Ciao
Hannes