[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8707 (6810)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 05 January 2022 12:03 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC903A0B08 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:03:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fh-Is986aTuw for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE1A3A0B07 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:03:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id 029521436F2; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 04:03:08 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: jan@jangoebel.com, brian.d.campbell@gmail.com, ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com, Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net, oauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220105120309.029521436F2@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 04:03:08 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/tF8cxetEiKmUWSheTXBoUi10nBo>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8707 (6810)
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2022 12:03:14 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8707, "Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6810 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Jan Goebel <jan@jangoebel.com> Section: 4 Original Text ------------- In typical OAuth deployments the authorization sever is in a position to observe and track a significant amount of user and client behavior. Corrected Text -------------- In typical OAuth deployments, the authorization server is in a position to observe and track a significant amount of user and client behavior. Notes ----- 1. typo: sever -> server 2. I think we also need a comma after "In typical OAuth deployments" because it is an introductory phrase, but maybe a native English speaker can confirm. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8707 (draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Resource Indicators for OAuth 2.0 Publication Date : February 2020 Author(s) : B. Campbell, J. Bradley, H. Tschofenig Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Web Authorization Protocol Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8707 (6… RFC Errata System
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC870… Brian Campbell