Re: [OAUTH-WG] Lifetime of refresh token

John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com> Fri, 28 August 2015 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4D81B2F29 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mMjFgc2D99B1 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-f49.google.com (mail-qg0-f49.google.com [209.85.192.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C881B2F17 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgj62 with SMTP id 62so36493870qgj.2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:41:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=asumWdUFK2gOl+OOk94p9d28kBBwx6rM1AkpEdpCAEA=; b=PkijP/za2TKTv4bILIV3pqjt9yz872ZttltMWzMEUJWH4IOKF9lIagUEgwdfqDhgFv qB8Q9dBEkzQ2PamJSaJp9e60iMqt8AiBYeUW5DwkrHsyC66PegFSEui9P6yLibcBNLj/ 9tL11Y3D9paNtNTnioSTFRlNuU9iE7Gms+0aTYMjbhG9ambh+dRzrKepTeKPMqh92GYd D+6HTcI4TfbEPVku9j1FpjKj43Xgfmb48EMkZPsLU8iv+yVcyvNL02aVddgO8GsHiStB 1prpTe7oinaxlPFazPyDJLznLTXVt+QFYAHXmY355gq4+Uuw7aQCZcJpadtJXcpinImg FXPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlk7F9f2MD5IUy9OtrY7NsOl6FYHFzjIB1a+Rq0+kepTk7MPyBKeHUsegx/8FQYoQZObpqZ
X-Received: by 10.140.235.142 with SMTP id g136mr21361430qhc.18.1440794494751; Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.8.103] ([181.202.146.150]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s69sm4126824qgd.18.2015.08.28.13.41.33 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:41:34 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5861A81D-56D7-4D52-998B-FE20D5B9B28E"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMbDefsu0XAQvCR2+ako4PbsoKeezLwgizJ4dVsKMAY_DXM_wA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:41:30 -0300
Message-Id: <B314B571-A0E4-41B0-8F05-B89DA5A73113@ve7jtb.com>
References: <CAMbDefvdNNLHSMZEXDDOhukzha8G0WLb9j7f6qVXTrXaGCQxTQ@mail.gmail.com> <DE1DE335-FBEF-494A-97F0-BE0F9D4BABAA@ve7jtb.com> <C44C21E6-2559-4099-8B21-3544DE8965BD@lodderstedt.net> <CAMbDefsu0XAQvCR2+ako4PbsoKeezLwgizJ4dVsKMAY_DXM_wA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Donghwan Kim <flowersinthesand@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/xakEZrlFQGfSz6x6VhSF0QMR9uM>
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Lifetime of refresh token
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 20:41:39 -0000

I would use a 5 min AT and roll the refresh token per https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#page-47 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#page-47> with a 1 month expiry if that is what you want for a inactivity timeout after which the user must authenticate again.   The user can always revoke the refresh token.

Rolling the refresh token also has the advantage that if the token leaks or is stollen then you will detect the second use of the expired refresh token and invalidate both, so the user needs to loggin.

In general I think rolling the refresh token is a good idea though it is not popular, I think it is more secure.

John B.



> On Aug 28, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Donghwan Kim <flowersinthesand@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm sorry to introduce a common topic.
> 
> As John has suggested, I'm going to design that 
> 
> * An access token should be short lived e.g. 5 minutes (not to hit the AS to verify the token or 1 hour (to hit the AS to verify the token). I'm inclined to 5 minutes for stateless architecture of RSs.
> * A refresh token should have 1 month of expiration time by default. If it turns out that some access token expired, its refresh token should refresh the token. Then, so called persistent login can be implemented regardless of the form of authentication. Only if it fails for some reason e.g. token revocation or inactivity for 1 month, a user is logged out automatically and should log in again.
> * A refresh token should be able to be revoked somehow. With 5 minutes approach, it will invalidate only the refresh token (Yes the attacker can have 5 minutes at most), and with 1 hour approach, it will invalidate the refresh token as well as the corresponding access token.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Donghwan
> 
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net <mailto:torsten@lodderstedt.net>> wrote:
> Refresh tokens are also used by public clients, e.g. native apps. OIDC allows to acquire a new id token from a refresh token as well. Note: this does not mean a fresh authentication but a refreshed id token containing the data of the original authentication transaction. 
> 
> Am 24. August 2015 17:08:21 MESZ, schrieb John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com <mailto:ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>>:
> I think Nat’s diagram about the problems of doing pseudo authentication with OAuth is being taken out of context.
> 
> The refresh token dosen’t expire, it is revoked by the user or system.  In some cases refresh tokens are automatically revoked if the users session to the AS ends.  I think AOL typically revokes refresh tokens when sessions terminate.
> 
> OpenID Connect provides a separate id_token with a independent lifetime from the refresh token.  A client may keep a refresh token for a much longer time than the user has a login session with the AS.
> 
> Refresh tokens are typically used by confidential clients that are using a client secret in combination with the refresh token for getting a new access token.
> 
> By design access tokens should be short lived as the AS is expected to have a way of revoking refresh tokens but not access tokens.
> A access token that dosen't expire , and can’t be revoked is not a good idea.
> 
> John B.
> 
> 
>> On Aug 24, 2015, at 2:41 AM, Donghwan Kim <flowersinthesand@gmail.com <mailto:flowersinthesand@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> According to Figure 2 from http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-1.5 <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-1.5>, refresh token can be used to refresh an expired access token without requesting resource owner to sign in again (uncomfortable experience). However, if it's true, isn't it that refresh token might be used to request a new access token even years later? and then isn't refresh token the same with access token which never expires?
>> 
>> I intended to use refresh token to implement persistent login by sending a refresh request before issued access token expires (expires_in runs out). But if refresh token works even if access token expired already, sending a refresh request on application start up would be enough.
>> 
>> So I'm not sure what I'm missing about refresh token as well as how to implement persistent login using it (you can regard authentication here pseudo-authentication illustrated in https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/OpenIDvs.Pseudo-AuthenticationusingOAuth.svg <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/32/OpenIDvs.Pseudo-AuthenticationusingOAuth.svg>). What is the lifetime of refresh token?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> -- Donghwan
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>
> 
> 
> 
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org <mailto:OAuth@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>
>