Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values

"Phil Hunt (IDM)" <phil.hunt@oracle.com> Thu, 21 January 2016 01:30 UTC

Return-Path: <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBC61B2C8B for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.202
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t79edJVNWrp0 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067E31B2C89 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u0L1UPKE030929 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:26 GMT
Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0L1UPo4024601 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:25 GMT
Received: from abhmp0011.oracle.com (abhmp0011.oracle.com [141.146.116.17]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u0L1UPWZ020955; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:25 GMT
Received: from [192.168.3.132] (/96.44.121.42) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:25 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: "Phil Hunt (IDM)" <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13C75)
In-Reply-To: <8A2DAF46-BAF7-439D-8FE3-65EA2DA8E692@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 17:30:14 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E746E194-3865-4280-9835-657E8A66365F@oracle.com>
References: <569E2276.5070407@gmx.net> <8A2DAF46-BAF7-439D-8FE3-65EA2DA8E692@mit.edu>
To: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>
X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/y5JIWsYbV9cpbAO2YAeDB_rkEb8>
Cc: "<oauth@ietf.org>" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:30:29 -0000

Right but OAuth is the layer that needs to relay the request to the authen service. 

+1 on adoption

However we need to discuss more on w this as a registry or how it is used in the overall architecture to pass signalling (hint maybe that falls to connect?) 

Phil

> On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:37, Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> Just reiterating my stance that this document detailing user authentication methods has no place in the OAuth working group.
> 
> — Justin
> 
>> On Jan 19, 2016, at 6:48 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> this is the call for adoption of Authentication Method Reference Values, see
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-03
>> 
>> Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the
>> adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
>> working group.
>> 
>> Note: The feedback during the Yokohama meeting was inconclusive, namely
>> 9 for / zero against / 6 persons need more information.
>> 
>> You feedback will therefore be important to find out whether we should
>> do this work in the OAuth working group.
>> 
>> Ciao
>> Hannes & Derek
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth