[OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 19 January 2016 11:48 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDC41B2CA9 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:48:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKRyT42y_SZw for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:48:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E343D1B2CAA for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 03:48:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.141] ([82.142.85.169]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSq5p-1al6kk0Svd-00RtSJ for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:48:07 +0100
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <569E2276.5070407@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 12:48:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FQsKXhauRHBs9Ttf9FgGVSOkCK2HHtG65"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Qf6Rxvx5jsBIizXqfY8lsYVWYY6MXgWN7zF8Z3WjEoxHUFadGwP e7Eik1o63CV5iPJ6mEmmSlrTvIvoAG3PJXbq+UsXYOtUoZDpz4MI8NtFGMi8b2Q2pC9/mN7 tJi9fqu6by/87TkmJJUoKUanLvP4xTZV4pwaPKfUDVhWkgeM4+U2Y9nEMFS+QJc9cY+RymJ 0CumKzNso6Ugds+UQP73w==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:U8Oh2ermH+g=:yvNkq91TjILRp3FItq1gzj 9hV+hl9TH6kOfHBg4LAdZxC1wS3NTko3OgPixV5/jFmUdz0LV3Y2uNl3maQyhP5mGkIOztG4l ap25QJJTbIQT7qV1eP5W6jcwNCtjcuXrt9WzmjaRB80G+gB5j2pXcMZoVRxFTqjsosXUlzVs5 Ads7N4icp77MKI8+d7oQmKaoP22Js14uNC8lwGd8lpJbzeREIXwus2AX86Vot39X/uiZfIiUn zRCwYW3kxgniUQA5cYQFkQa0mL1upoCmIAn2xyTvzzGcE9hDzr3/+mhh+ThkaUKVVBNP1yLbW lhoZ8f5amp6sbPrmn16wwKti1ogzlElwXOJ60NhXsr9DG7Tho5rwa/SmxsN94RhrQDLzewgM/ B3Cdh8JZJWD0pucU84N8c+eWRcXLkQTBHe6wOpEnbXSp1Re4HCY4In2KDD5WAqKQQG2JIhu1k 28mcUKBAHDcCwQEKSpwWHOmrFLVOuPvHI06v+tsMOMoqUBlV+wiQdyDtpCxyLXCNBty1D6sxJ PPdIsK8gPdM2dFMZpF59AhYY6vmr7xNhMonLRJZ8lEu8as8SSLYHtUjXJFPFKKWREWyhUTNMR imhQM5a0voYPRnBuIhAwoaqJ/iDaneGaEM8isuIaIpOoCi6OHnc78iQTzAChf06sPn11gmuHb Y+/tH8cGhd6gD1SigAa7eSHA5YHuBXxHuOg2BPKLOq6C8h7KR1sf+bbKMqtSlw5Rw3AmwwwP1 n6ax+UU889+PPViSD5+p0ncXlAuCJ3WD/NTYVXMV5lPqDUgi9oSmlL5UKGM=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/D-UvwettgM7Qnoa0iLhVLsJxjqY>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 11:48:10 -0000
Hi all, this is the call for adoption of Authentication Method Reference Values, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-03 Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working group. Note: The feedback during the Yokohama meeting was inconclusive, namely 9 for / zero against / 6 persons need more information. You feedback will therefore be important to find out whether we should do this work in the OAuth working group. Ciao Hannes & Derek
- [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication Meth… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … Manger, James
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … William Denniss
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … Phil Hunt (IDM)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: Authentication … Roland Hedberg