Re: [obscurity-interest] Prague face-to-face scheduling

I confess I did not have that particular definition in mind, but it
certainly represents an interesting use case.

On Mar 18, 2011 12:03 PM, "Eric Brunner-Williams" <ebw@abenaki.wabanaki.net>
wrote:

I'm assuming that the phrase "counter-communication" refers to interaction
at an institutional "counter", and sensitive data is communicated, e.g.,
personally identifying information and pharmaceutical prescriptions or
banking identifiers, etc.

Is this a correct assumption?

Thanks in advance,
Eric

On 3/16/11 9:04 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote:

> A new IETF non-working group email list has been created.
>
> List address: obscurity-interest@ietf.org
> Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/obscurity-interest/
> To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest
>
> Description:  This list is for discussion of the requirements and
> technology for enabling communications, especially near or real-time,
> between persons subject to high levels of counter-communication
> interception. The requirements are believed to relate to privacy, data
> integrity, unlinkability, and the general intercept (lawful or otherwise)
> problem, which is broader than the "privacy" problem considered by IETF.
> This list intended to focus on practical requirement and actionable work
> rather than general theory. Discussion may lead to new protocol action,
> enhanced guidance for "security considerations" sections in IETF
> specifications, and further research inside or outside of the IETF.
>
> For additional information, please contact the list administrators.
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
obscurity-interest mailing list
obscurity-interest@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/obscurity-interest