Re: [ogpx] Seed capability behavior

Arrogant Cyberstar <arrogant.cyberstar@gmail.com> Thu, 21 January 2010 01:00 UTC

Return-Path: <arrogant.cyberstar@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A7528C134; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:00:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JDMGwcACAebb; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:00:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-px0-f186.google.com (mail-px0-f186.google.com [209.85.216.186]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0B128C133; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:00:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pxi16 with SMTP id 16so4139996pxi.29 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:00:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DarJUKaWdNakxLTp5Jrm+H94oMH6HmKATQNI12PU+AQ=; b=blwJb9pbTQhSdGR9PqJtuiBYx0XrkdpTqRF8uqLA5/mC0HHZzhY5UiIXnATs4vywTN Xo5btrIeBDtRRlbU9ZdCFC3VWw8EuZNZ6MIKrp2mbqWn33nfawJCNI2w2in5Yg5J2tuH vUkPaGdqq4VSbA5WcQIj2DDapzSyP7yMCEhk8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=eLNWttUOkaVDVPJzTStjDhiQ+hjlaGlReZZfcUHZDsVpuZKsS5AGEXePgY1rlg+Djp 1CagvzFZ+KjmCYYvmId4vu5fwVQNGuBYLjhxGI4GPJW+dczW3jSZ5KPQM6Oyxs3InlGH TQe6aBl/cQBeSfqFQIZ0zQwkuKC4GZUGZC4NM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.237.19 with SMTP id k19mr514276wah.47.1264035606425; Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:00:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <897336.43092.qm@web112804.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
References: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DC4B2DCF9@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com> <OFEDB4A382.947559FB-ON852576B1.007B59C0-852576B1.007C448C@us.ibm.com> <3a880e2c1001201643p3a885e23ma60f0c9df8d783b@mail.gmail.com> <186103.40609.qm@web112807.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5cca23bc1001201653m67298deey1c3395b80b5b0e29@mail.gmail.com> <606825.66007.qm@web112815.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5cca23bc1001201657u1f59c7aco8369580e125cad87@mail.gmail.com> <567455.42162.qm@web112804.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <5cca23bc1001201658w43771114t8448d4514f4b4500@mail.gmail.com> <897336.43092.qm@web112804.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:00:06 -0800
Message-ID: <5cca23bc1001201700n19c5e795w881f7d178f2bc6fd@mail.gmail.com>
From: Arrogant Cyberstar <arrogant.cyberstar@gmail.com>
To: Hogmanay Milestone <hogmanay.milestone@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0016e64c2cea4df1e3047da2396d"
Cc: "Infinity Linden (Meadhbh Hamrick)" <infinity@lindenlab.com>, ogpx-bounces@ietf.org, "ogpx@ietf.org" <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Seed capability behavior
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:40:26 -0000

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Hogmanay Milestone <
hogmanay.milestone@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> >>but caps are really more about delegation. you get a cap so you can
> delegate a privilege to a deputy.
> >>
> >
> >are you suggesting that a client delegate service request to a third
> party?
>
> yes, the client could request a seed cap using the username and password
> and give the seed cap to a proxy.
>
>
why? why not just make the proxy the client?