Re: [ogpx] Cable Beach + VWRAP update

I'm very excited to see this. A lot of ground work has been laid in the 
past year, I'm really hoping 2010 is the year when we, in several
overlapping communities begin to harvest that work, and see some very 
exciting results. 

I view the current (somewhat stale) OGPX module, the test Agent Domain 
we've been working with and Cable Beach as test beds to
better understand the problem space. None of them are a definitive 
implementation of what a full VWRAP system will look like. I'm not
even sure *anyone* will ever implement every single possible VWRAP 
permutation in a single deployment. In fact, one of the major
points of the specification, is permitting people to build and deploy 
different variations, and permit interoperation. Specifications are
well removed from high level designs. The one lays out a roadmap for many 
systems, the other lays out a design for a single system or 
small set of systems. 

I look forward to seeing a lot of new energy emerge from this development. 

- David
~ Zha

ogpx-bounces@ietf.org wrote on 01/15/2010 08:13:22 PM:

> [image removed] 
> 
> [ogpx] Cable Beach + VWRAP update
> 
> Hurliman, John 
> 
> to:
> 
> ogpx@ietf.org
> 
> 01/15/2010 08:13 PM
> 
> Sent by:
> 
> ogpx-bounces@ietf.org
> 
> My post got a bit long and includes some pictures, so I put the 
> Cable Beach + VWRAP update in a blog post at http://
> www.jhurliman.org/2010/01/merging-vwrap-and-cable-beach/
> 
> The comments on that post are closed to encourage discussion to move
> to the appropriate IETF mailing list (OAuth-WG or VWRAP).
> 
> John_______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx